Drill Segment Abrasive Patterns Using Precalculated Performance Models

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for manufacturing drill segments with abrasive particles, such as diamond drill segments, are inefficient and costly due to the complexity of optimizing performance parameters, requiring numerous test series without guaranteed improvement.

Innovation Solution

A method for manufacturing drill segments with precalculated patterns of abrasive particles, utilizing a physical model and machine learning to optimize performance parameters, reducing the need for laborious testing and minimizing costs.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional test series are used to optimize drill segment performance, then performance parameters can be improved, but time and costs increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveperformance parameterVSAvoidtime
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by precalculating the optimal pattern of abrasive particles using a physical model before actual manufacturing. This allows the performance parameters to be optimized in advance through computational simulation, avoiding the need for numerous physical test series and significantly reducing development time while maintaining reliable performance optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses a physical model to create a virtual copy of the drill segment and its abrasive particle pattern. By simulating and precalculating performance parameters on this virtual model, the invention avoids the time-consuming process of manufacturing multiple physical test samples, thus resolving the contradiction between achieving reliable performance optimization and reducing time loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Reliability

If conventional test series are used to optimize drill segment performance, then performance parameters can be improved, but costs increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveperformance parameterVSAvoidcosts
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

By precalculating the optimal abrasive particle pattern using a physical model before manufacturing, the invention eliminates the need for expensive physical test series. This preliminary computational optimization reduces material costs and development expenses while ensuring reliable performance parameters are achieved in the first manufacturing attempt.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a virtual copy through physical modeling to simulate drill segment performance. This virtual simulation allows for cost-free optimization of performance parameters, avoiding the substantial material and manufacturing costs associated with conventional physical test series while maintaining reliable optimization results.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Reliability

If numerous test series are conducted to optimize abrasive particle arrangement, then performance can be improved, but the complexity of the development process increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveperformance parameterVSAvoiddevelopment process
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by using a physical model to precalculate the optimal abrasive particle pattern before actual manufacturing. This computational approach simplifies the development process by replacing complex, iterative physical testing with a single precalculation step, thereby reducing process complexity while maintaining reliable performance optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Measurement precision

If physical test series are used to determine optimal patterns, then accurate performance data can be obtained, but the number of required tests increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveperformance data accuracyVSAvoiddevelopment efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a virtual copy through physical modeling that accurately simulates drill segment performance. This virtual model allows for precise determination of optimal abrasive particle patterns without the need for multiple physical tests, thereby maintaining measurement precision while dramatically improving development efficiency and productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Data Source

PatentUS20250282081A1Method for manufacturing a drill segment, drill segment, and drill bit
Publication Date: 2025.09.11 HILTI AG
  • US20250282081A1 patent drawing
  • US20250282081A1 patent drawing
  • US20250282081A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for manufacturing a drill segment for a drill bit, in particular for a drill bit for machining reinforced concrete, wherein the drill segment has at least one layer with a multiplicity of abrasive particles, wherein the abrasive particles form a pattern within the layer. The method includes at least one performance parameter of the drill segment that has the pattern precalculated and/or the pattern is determined according to a precalculation of the performance parameter, and, in particular if the performance parameter attains or exceeds a particular value, a drill segment that has at least one layer with abrasive particles arranged in accordance with the pattern is manufactured. A drill segment and to a drill bit. It is possible to quickly and inexpensively develop and manufacture particularly high-performance drill segments for drill bits.