Turf Mower Path Control for Precision Cutting

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Mower operations are labor-intensive and prone to operator error due to manual adjustment of cutting speed, height, and path, which can lead to inconsistencies in vegetation maintenance.

Innovation Solution

A mower equipped with a controller that receives location data to automatically adjust cutting speed, height, and path based on predefined maps and sensors, using a vehicle control system to ensure precise and consistent vegetation management.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If manual adjustment of cutting speed, height, and path is used, then operator control is maintained, but labor intensity increases and operator error potential increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperator controlVSAvoidlabor intensity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The mower system automatically adjusts cutting speed, height, and path without requiring continuous manual intervention. The controller receives location data from sensors and autonomously modifies operating conditions based on the predetermined path and terrain characteristics, allowing the system to serve itself rather than requiring constant operator input.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

Manual mechanical adjustment by the operator is replaced with an automated electronic control system. The controller electronically adjusts cutting parameters based on location data and sensor input, substituting the mechanical manual adjustment process with an automated electromechanical system that reduces labor intensity while maintaining control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Adaptability or versatility

If manual adjustment of cutting parameters is used, then flexibility is maintained, but manufacturing precision of cutting height and speed deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveflexibilityVSAvoidcutting height consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses sensors to detect terrain conditions and location data, feeding this information back to the controller which then automatically adjusts cutting parameters. This closed-loop feedback mechanism ensures consistent cutting precision by continuously monitoring and adjusting based on actual conditions, eliminating the variability inherent in manual adjustment while maintaining adaptability to different terrains.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The cutting parameters are made dynamically adjustable rather than fixed or manually set. The controller continuously modifies cutting speed and height in real-time based on location data and sensor input, allowing the system to adapt dynamically to changing terrain conditions while maintaining precise control that manual adjustment cannot achieve.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Manufacturing precision

If automated control is implemented, then precision and consistency improve, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecutting precisionVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The controller serves multiple functions: it receives location data from sensors, processes terrain information, determines optimal cutting parameters, and automatically adjusts cutting speed and height. By consolidating these multiple functions into a single multi-functional controller, the system achieves high cutting precision without proportionally increasing overall device complexity, as one component performs several critical roles.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Reliability

If operator intervention is reduced, then human error is reduced, but automation complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveerror reductionVSAvoidautomation system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system autonomously monitors its own operation through sensors and location data, automatically adjusting parameters without human intervention. This self-service capability reduces human error by eliminating manual input while the automation complexity is managed through integrated sensors and a unified controller that work together as a cohesive system rather than separate complex components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS20250295060A1Precision mowing for turf mowers
Publication Date: 2025.09.25 TEXTRON INC
  • US20250295060A1 patent drawing
  • US20250295060A1 patent drawing
  • US20250295060A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A mower includes a chassis, a driveline coupled to the chassis and configured to drive a tractive element to propel the mower, a cutting unit coupled to the chassis, the cutting unit including a housing and a cutting element rotatably coupled to the housing, and a controller operatively coupled to the driveline. The controller is configured to identify a desired path for the mower, receive location data indicating a current path being traveled by the mower, determine that the current path of the mower deviates from the desired path, and control the driveline to oppose the deviation of the current path from the desired path.