Pre-combustion Chamber Flow Agitator for Lean Mixture Ignition

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Internal combustion engines using lean air-fuel mixtures often experience misfires and incomplete combustion due to the lack of a reliable and efficient ignition source, necessitating a more effective pre-combustion chamber system.

Innovation Solution

A pre-combustion chamber system with a flow agitator and cooling chamber design that enhances mixing by creating agitated flow and increased heat exchange, reducing fuel requirements and emissions while improving engine stability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If a lean air-fuel mixture is used to reduce emission and increase fuel efficiency, then fuel efficiency improves, but combustion reliability deteriorates due to misfires and incomplete combustion

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefuel efficiencyVSAvoidcombustion reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The combustion chamber is divided into two separate chambers: a pre-combustion chamber for reliable ignition and a main combustion chamber for lean combustion. This segmentation allows each chamber to be optimized for its specific function, resolving the contradiction between lean mixture efficiency and combustion reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The pre-combustion chamber acts as an intermediary that generates a high-temperature ignition source which then ignites the lean air-fuel mixture in the main combustion chamber. This mediator enables reliable ignition of lean mixtures that would otherwise be difficult to ignite

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If a pre-combustion chamber system is used to provide higher energy ignition source, then combustion reliability improves, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecombustion reliabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The pre-combustion chamber and main combustion chamber are merged into a single integrated component with a shared housing structure. This merging reduces the number of separate parts and simplifies manufacturing while maintaining the functional benefits of the two-chamber design

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The pre-combustion chamber housing serves multiple functions: it contains the pre-combustion chamber, provides structural support, and integrates with the main combustion chamber housing. This multi-functionality reduces the need for additional components, simplifying the overall system

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Power

If fuel is injected into the pre-combustion chamber and ignited, then ignition energy increases, but fuel consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveignition energyVSAvoidfuel consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

A small amount of fuel is injected into the pre-combustion chamber to create a high-temperature ignition source, which then ignites the much larger quantity of lean air-fuel mixture in the main combustion chamber. This partial action approach uses minimal fuel to achieve the ignition function while maintaining overall fuel efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the fuel injection parameters by injecting a controlled, reduced quantity of fuel into the pre-combustion chamber compared to direct injection into the main chamber. This parameter change optimizes the balance between ignition energy and fuel consumption

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The enhanced mixing and cooling design improve combustion efficiency, reduce emissions, and increase engine stability by providing a stronger ignition source for lean fuel mixtures, leading to more reliable engine operation.

Implementation Method 1

The flow agitator is configured to increase flow disturbance in the pre-combustion chamber

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFlow disturbance: Turbulence

Implementation Method 2

a cooling chamber defined between the pre-combustion chamber housing and the cooling chamber housing

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat exchange: Heat Exchanger

Data Source

PatentUS11686242B2Pre-combustion chamber system
Publication Date: 2023.06.27 SIEMENS ENERGY INC
  • US11686242B2 patent drawing
  • US11686242B2 patent drawing
  • US11686242B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A pre-combustion chamber system is presented. The pre-combustion chamber system includes a pre-combustion chamber housing defining a pre-combustion chamber, a cooling chamber housing surrounding the pre-combustion chamber housing, a cooling chamber defined between the pre-combustion chamber housing and the cooling chamber housing. The pre-combustion chamber system includes a flow agitator arranged in the pre-combustion chamber housing protruding into the pre-combustion chamber. The flow agitator increases flow disturbance in the pre-combustion chamber for improving mixture of fuel and air. Cooling of the pre-combustion chamber system is improved by dividing the cooling chamber into a cooling inner chamber and a cooling outlet chamber or by arranging cooling fins in the pre-combustion chamber housing extending into the cooling chamber.