Pre-configuring Payment Vehicles for Fraud Prevention

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for preventing credit card fraud, such as signature matching and photo identification, are inadequate and often impractical, leading to significant financial losses for credit card issuing companies and merchants due to the inability to effectively secure transactions before unauthorized use.

Innovation Solution

A system and method for pre-configuring payment vehicles, such as credit cards, by specifying transaction criteria like merchant location, type, date, and amount, which are communicated to a pre-configuration and authorization engine to ensure only authorized transactions are approved, using smart devices and various communication methods to notify users and pre-populate transaction details.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If signature matching is required to prevent credit card fraud, then security is improved, but transaction time increases and ease of operation deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefraud preventionVSAvoidtransaction convenience
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system pre-configures transaction criteria (merchant category, location, amount ranges, time windows) before the actual transaction occurs. This preliminary setup enables automated real-time verification without requiring manual signature collection during the transaction, thus maintaining security while improving convenience.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical signature verification process with an automated electronic system that compares transaction parameters against pre-configured criteria. This substitution eliminates the need for physical signature panels and manual verification, reducing transaction time while maintaining fraud prevention capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Reliability

If photo identification is required to verify purchaser identity, then security is improved, but device complexity and ease of operation worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveidentity verificationVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces physical photo ID verification with an automated electronic verification process that uses pre-configured transaction criteria and real-time parameter comparison. This electronic substitution reduces the need for complex physical verification mechanisms while maintaining identity verification security.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a pre-configuration and authorization engine as an intermediary that automatically verifies transaction legitimacy by comparing parameters against pre-set criteria. This intermediary handles the verification complexity behind the scenes, simplifying the user experience while maintaining security.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Ease of manufacture

If traditional fraud prevention measures are used, then implementation is simple, but financial losses from fraud increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimplementation simplicityVSAvoidfinancial loss
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

By pre-configuring transaction criteria before purchases occur, the system enables automated fraud prevention that is both simple to implement and effective at reducing losses. The pre-configuration setup is straightforward, and the automated real-time verification efficiently blocks fraudulent transactions without requiring complex ongoing intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements real-time feedback by continuously monitoring transaction parameters against pre-configured criteria and automatically approving or denying transactions based on matches. This feedback mechanism provides simple implementation with effective fraud reduction, as the automated system learns from and responds to transaction patterns.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS10880113B1Systems and methods for pre-configuring a payment vehicle
Publication Date: 2020.12.29 UNITED SERVICES AUTOMOBILE ASSOCIATION (USAA)
  • US10880113B1 patent drawing
  • US10880113B1 patent drawing
  • US10880113B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods and systems for pre-configuring a payment vehicle are described. In some embodiments, transaction criteria pertaining to a payment vehicle is proactively received in advance of an anticipated transaction. A transaction authorization request may be received from a point of sale device and may be generated by the point of sale device in response to an attempted use of the payment vehicle. Information about the transaction in the transaction request may be compared with the transaction criteria to determine whether to authorize the transaction.