Predefined Shape Libraries for Defect-Controlled Additive Manufacturing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current additive manufacturing processes face challenges in consistently producing high-quality parts with minimal defects and distortion due to the wide range of energy source power levels and scan speeds required, and the decoupling of scan paths from process parameters, leading to inefficiencies and resource-intensive trial-and-error adjustments.

Innovation Solution

A method involving the segregation of a part's shape into predefined shapes from a library, assembling these shapes into a second model with predefined energy source power levels, scan paths, and scan speeds, and simulating areas between models to adjust parameters for minimal defects and distortion, allowing for efficient additive manufacturing.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a broad range of energy source power levels and scan speeds are used to fuse feedstock powder, then flexibility in processing different materials is improved, but defects and distortion increase due to inadequate or excessive energy input

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflexibility in processing different materialsVSAvoiddefects and distortion
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The scan path is divided into multiple segments, each with independently optimized process parameters (power level, scan speed). This allows different regions of the part to have tailored parameters suited to their specific geometric features and material requirements, preventing both inadequate and excessive energy input in different areas.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different process parameters are applied to different regions of the scan path based on local geometric characteristics. Critical areas with complex features receive optimized parameter sets, while simpler regions use standard parameters, ensuring high precision where needed without compromising overall flexibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Ease of operation

If scan path is automatically generated by additive manufacturing system based on CAD file, then ease of operation is improved, but defects and distortion occur due to decoupling from process parameters

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomatic scan path generationVSAvoiddefects and distortion
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The scan path generation and process parameter selection are merged into a unified system. The system simultaneously determines both the geometric path and the optimal process parameters for each segment, ensuring they are coupled and optimized together rather than independently.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts process parameters (power level, scan speed) based on the generated scan path geometry. As the scan path encounters different geometric features, the parameters automatically change to match the local requirements, maintaining precision throughout the build.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Manufacturing precision

If trial-and-error adjustments of CAD model, scan path, energy source power level, and scan speed are performed, then manufacturing precision is improved, but productivity is reduced due to time-consuming iterations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveminimal defects and distortionVSAvoidtime and resource efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary optimization of scan paths and process parameters using simulation and predictive algorithms before actual manufacturing. This preliminary action identifies optimal parameter sets and potential problem areas, eliminating the need for time-consuming trial-and-error iterations during production.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates virtual copies of the build process through simulation to test and optimize scan paths and parameters digitally. By copying and testing scenarios in virtual space, optimization is achieved without consuming physical materials or machine time, then the validated parameters are applied to actual manufacturing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Data Source

PatentUS10962958B2Library of predefined shapes for additive manufacturing processes
Publication Date: 2021.03.30 RTX CORP
  • US10962958B2 patent drawing
  • US10962958B2 patent drawing
  • US10962958B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method includes accessing a first model defining a shape of a part. The shape of the part is segregated into a plurality of predefined shapes selected from a library of predefined shapes. The predefined models for each of plurality of predefined shapes are assembled into a second model defining the shape of the part. The part is additively manufactured according to the second model.