Predicate Logic Tax Analysis System

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current accounting and tax software lacks the ability to efficiently apply tax and accounting principles to specific business transactions, requiring manual effort and expertise from accountants and attorneys to determine the correct accounting entries and tax consequences, and does not provide effective assistance in interpreting legal and tax authorities.

Innovation Solution

A computerized predicate logic implementation that paraphrases legal and tax authorities into logical statements, encodes them into a logic programming language, and applies semantic rules to automatically determine the correct accounting entries and tax consequences of transactions, reducing the need for manual intervention and improving efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If manual accounting and tax processing is performed by accountants and attorneys, then accurate application of tax and accounting principles is achieved, but time consumption and labor effort are excessive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of tax and accounting principle applicationVSAvoidtime consumption for accounting and tax processing
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the manual mechanical process of accountants and attorneys reviewing contracts, memoranda, and court decisions with an automated computerized system. The system uses natural language processing to parse legal documents, applies tax and accounting rules through algorithmic logic, and generates accounting entries automatically, thereby eliminating manual labor while maintaining accuracy through systematic rule application.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables self-service by automatically determining tax consequences and generating accounting entries without requiring manual intervention from accountants or attorneys. The computerized system independently analyzes transaction data, applies relevant tax authorities and accounting principles, and produces ready-to-record accounting entries, allowing the organization to process transactions autonomously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Loss of information

If current legal and tax research software is used to identify relevant authorities, then relevant tax authorities are found, but assistance in applying those authorities to specific facts and circumstances is not provided

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveidentification of relevant tax authoritiesVSAvoidapplication of authorities to specific cases
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the functions of identifying relevant tax authorities with the function of applying those authorities to specific facts. The system combines natural language processing capabilities to locate applicable tax laws and regulations with logical reasoning engines that automatically apply those laws to the specific transaction at hand, producing integrated results that include both the identified authority and its application outcome.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs multiple functions within a single integrated platform: it identifies relevant tax authorities, interprets their meaning, applies them to specific factual scenarios, and generates accounting entries. This multi-functional approach eliminates the need for separate manual steps of researching authorities and then separately applying them, providing a universal solution that handles the entire tax analysis workflow.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Measurement precision

If multiple steps are taken to review information and determine accounting entries, then accurate understanding of transaction consequences is achieved, but process complexity and inefficiency increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveunderstanding of transaction consequencesVSAvoidprocess complexity of accounting entry generation
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the complex accounting process into distinct modular components: natural language processing of legal documents, extraction of transaction facts, identification of applicable tax authorities, logical application of rules to facts, and generation of accounting entries. Each module handles a specific aspect of the analysis, making the overall complex process manageable, maintainable, and efficient while preserving accurate understanding of transaction consequences through systematic breakdown.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS10373268B1Determining correct answers to tax and accounting issues arising from business transactions and generating accounting entries to record those transactions using a computerized predicate logic implementation
Publication Date: 2019.08.06 ORPHYS HENRY A
  • US10373268B1 patent drawing
  • US10373268B1 patent drawing
  • US10373268B1 patent drawing

AI summary

At least one pertinent authority, in ordinary English language, is paraphrased into a series of intermediate forms. The at least one pertinent authority is at least one of a tax authority and an accounting authority. The series of intermediate forms are rendered into a corresponding series of logical statements. The series of logical statements are encoded into relations in a logic programming language.