Predicting Optimal Deep Brain Stimulation Parameters

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current deep brain stimulation (DBS) methods lack clear understanding of how the brain responds to different stimulation parameters, leading to suboptimal settings and lengthy optimization periods, often relying on trial and error, and existing automated systems may converge to suboptimal solutions without real-time feedback.

Innovation Solution

A system that includes a DBS system sending varied stimulation signals to implanted electrodes, a brain response acquisition system collecting data, and a prediction system using statistical metrics and brain atlases to predict optimal DBS parameters, such as frequency and pulse width, for personalized treatment.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If trial and error methods are used to select optimal DBS parameters, then parameter optimization can be achieved, but the optimization period becomes lengthy (3-6 months or longer)

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparameter optimization accuracyVSAvoidoptimization period
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by acquiring functional brain imaging data before DBS electrode implantation and using this pre-acquired data to predict optimal stimulation parameters. The prediction system processes imaging data and generates parameter recommendations prior to surgery, eliminating the need for lengthy post-surgical trial and error optimization periods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces feedback mechanisms by using functional imaging data to provide real-time information about brain response to stimulation parameters. The prediction system continuously refines parameter recommendations based on imaging feedback, allowing for rapid optimization without requiring months of clinical trial and error.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Productivity

If existing automated systems use initial guesses for parameter optimization, then real-time feedback can be provided, but the systems converge to suboptimal local minima resulting in inaccuracies

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereal-time feedback capabilityVSAvoidparameter optimization accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes the approach to parameter optimization by using multiple initial guesses derived from different functional imaging analysis methods. The prediction system varies imaging parameters and analysis approaches to generate diverse initial parameter sets, preventing convergence to suboptimal local minima and improving overall optimization accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses copying by creating multiple virtual models of brain response based on functional imaging data. The prediction system generates multiple simulated brain responses corresponding to different parameter sets, allowing comparison and selection of optimal parameters without relying on a single initial guess that may lead to suboptimal solutions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Reliability

If post-surgery structural and functional scans are used for parameter optimization, then feedback can be obtained after electrode implantation, but the optimization cannot be performed pre-surgically

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefeedback validityVSAvoidoptimization timing
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs all necessary parameter optimization actions before surgery by acquiring and processing functional brain imaging data pre-surgically. The prediction system analyzes imaging data and generates optimal parameter recommendations in advance, allowing for immediate application after electrode implantation without requiring post-surgical scans for optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS11273310B2Systems and methods for predicting optimal deep brain stimulation parameters
Publication Date: 2022.03.15 PLYMOUTH TECHNOLOGIES LLC
  • US11273310B2 patent drawing
  • US11273310B2 patent drawing
  • US11273310B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and method for optimizing parameters of a DBS pulse signal for treatment of a patient is provided. In predicting optimal DBS parameters, functional brain data is input into a predictor system, the functional brain data acquired responsive to a sweeping across a multi-dimensional parameter space of one or more DBS parameters. Statistical metrics of brain response are extracted from the functional brain data for one or more ROIs or voxels of the brain via the predictor system, and a DBS functional atlas is accessed, via the predictor system, that comprises disease-specific brain response maps derived from DBS treatment at optimal DBS parameter settings for a plurality of diseases or neurological conditions. One or more optimal DBS parameters are predicted for the patient based on the statistical metrics of brain response and the DBS functional atlas via the predictor system.