Prediction Value Correction Using Distribution Feedback

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Numerical prediction models face reduced performance when distances between selected similar examples and the current state are large, leading to deviations in prediction distributions and reduced accuracy.

Innovation Solution

An information processing apparatus that includes a processor for selecting similar cases, estimators for frequency data of observation and prediction values, and a corrector that adjusts prediction values based on cumulative distribution functions to align with observed data, enhancing prediction accuracy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If similar examples are selected from the database based on distance to current state, then prediction coverage is improved, but prediction accuracy deteriorates when distances are large

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprediction coverageVSAvoidprediction accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system estimates the cumulative distribution function of prediction values from selected similar examples and compares it with the cumulative distribution function of observation values. Based on this feedback comparison, correction values are calculated and applied to adjust prediction values, thereby improving accuracy while maintaining broad prediction coverage

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system transforms prediction values by adding correction values derived from distribution function comparisons. This parameter change approach adjusts the prediction results to better match observed data distributions, resolving the accuracy issue while preserving the ability to handle diverse cases

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Device complexity

If a simple selection method is used to find similar cases, then device complexity is reduced, but prediction performance deteriorates when examples are far from current state

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveselection method complexityVSAvoidprediction performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The cumulative distribution function acts as an intermediary between the simple selection process and the final prediction accuracy. By comparing distribution functions and using them to calculate correction values, the system bridges the gap between basic similarity selection and high-performance prediction without complicating the selection methodology

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS11868431B2Information processing apparatus, information processing method, and non-transitory computer readable medium
Publication Date: 2024.01.09 KK TOSHIBA
  • US11868431B2 patent drawing
  • US11868431B2 patent drawing
  • US11868431B2 patent drawing

AI summary

According to one embodiment, an information processing apparatus includes: a processor configured to select a first case based on subject data including at least one feature, and acquire a first prediction value that is a value of an objective variable included in the first case; a first estimator configured to estimate frequency data indicating frequencies of observation values of the objective variable, based on a history of observation values of the objective variable; a second estimator configured to estimate first frequency data indicating frequencies of first prediction values, based on a history of first prediction values acquired before the first prediction value is acquired; and a corrector configured to correct the first prediction value acquired by the processor, based on the frequency data and the first frequency data.