Prediction Validation Model Using Token Mutation for Classifier Outputs

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing predictive data analysis solutions face efficiency and reliability shortcomings due to the need for extensive algorithms and domain-specific validation processes that require significant engineering work and computational resources, leading to a tradeoff between predictive accuracy and training speed.

Innovation Solution

A predictive data analysis framework using a prediction validation machine learning model that includes an embedding and mutation machine learning model to tokenize, embed, and mutate classification labels, allowing for domain-agnostic validation and revision of predictive output data, improving accuracy and reducing computational and storage requirements.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If extensive algorithms and domain-specific validation processes are used to validate predictive output data, then reliability is improved, but device complexity and computational resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepredictive accuracyVSAvoidengineering work
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces traditional mechanical validation processes (extensive algorithms and domain-specific validation procedures) with a neural network-based validation system. The validation neural network learns validation rules and patterns from training data, automatically validating predictive output data without requiring complex manual validation algorithms or domain expertise, thus reducing device complexity while maintaining reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The validation system performs self-validation through the neural network that automatically assesses the validity of predictive output data based on learned patterns. The system serves itself by using the trained validation neural network to independently validate predictions without requiring external domain experts or complex validation algorithms, reducing both engineering work and computational overhead

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If extensive algorithms and validation processes are used, then reliability is improved, but use of energy and computational resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepredictive accuracyVSAvoidcomputational resources
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The validation neural network performs partial validation by focusing on the most critical validation aspects learned during training, rather than executing exhaustive validation algorithms. This allows the system to achieve sufficient reliability with reduced computational effort and energy consumption, avoiding the need for extensive validation processes while maintaining acceptable predictive accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent substitutes energy-intensive traditional validation algorithms with a neural network-based validation system that has learned validation patterns during training. The neural network performs validation with lower computational overhead by leveraging learned representations rather than executing complex validation algorithms, thus reducing energy and computational resource usage while maintaining reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Measurement precision

If more training data entries are used, then predictive accuracy is improved, but productivity and training efficiency decrease

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepredictive accuracyVSAvoidtraining speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary action by pre-processing and tokenizing training data into structured representations (input sequences and output sequences) before training the neural networks. This preliminary structuring of data accelerates the training process by enabling more efficient data processing during training, allowing the system to achieve good predictive accuracy with fewer training iterations and faster training speed

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments training data into structured input sequences and output sequences with corresponding validity labels. This segmentation organizes training data into manageable, structured units that can be processed efficiently by the neural networks, improving training speed and productivity while maintaining the ability to learn accurate validation patterns from the segmented data structures

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS12541722B2Machine learning techniques for validating and mutating outputs from predictive systems
Publication Date: 2026.02.03 OPTUM INC
  • US12541722B2 patent drawing
  • US12541722B2 patent drawing
  • US12541722B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Various embodiments of the present disclosure provide methods, apparatus, systems, computing devices, computing entities, and/or the like for revising classifier predictions, wherein classification labels are tokenized according to an index of predefined classification labels. An embedding is created for each token using an embedding model. The embeddings are provided to a machine learning model that accepts a sequence of tokens as input and produces a sequence of tokens as output. Tokens are extracted from the output of the machine learning model and a classification label corresponding to each token is retrieved according to the index of predefined classification labels.