Predictive Access Control for False Positive Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional data security systems rely heavily on historical data to authenticate access and detect anomalies, which can lead to unnecessary flagging of normal activities as risky, especially during events like major life changes or external influences, such as weather conditions, potentially restricting authorized access.

Innovation Solution

A predictive approach that analyzes context data, including human behavior and external influences, to anticipate future actions and adjust access control decisions, using machine learning and rule-based methods to differentiate between expected and unexpected activities, thereby reducing false positives and enhancing risk identification.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If historical data is used to authenticate access and detect anomalies, then security accuracy is improved, but false positives increase and authorized access is restricted

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveanomaly detection accuracyVSAvoidauthorized access reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by proactively predicting future user actions and contexts before they occur. Machine learning models analyze current state data to forecast upcoming activities, allowing the system to prepare appropriate access control decisions in advance, thereby reducing false positives while maintaining security accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The access control system transitions from static historical data analysis to dynamic predictive analysis. The system continuously adapts to changing user contexts and behaviors by using machine learning models that update predictions based on real-time data, enabling flexible access decisions that maintain security while accommodating legitimate behavior changes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If strict access control based on historical patterns is implemented, then security is improved, but system adaptability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesecurityVSAvoidaccess control adaptability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements continuous feedback loops where machine learning models analyze the outcomes of access control decisions and use this information to refine future predictions. This feedback mechanism enables the system to learn from actual user behaviors and contextual factors, continuously improving both security accuracy and adaptability to changing conditions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically changes parameters such as prediction timeframes, data weighting factors, and decision thresholds based on contextual conditions. Machine learning models adjust these parameters in response to varying user contexts, event types, and risk levels, enabling flexible access control that adapts to different scenarios while maintaining security standards

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS9038134B1Managing predictions in data security systems
Publication Date: 2015.05.19 EMC IP HLDG CO LLC
  • US9038134B1 patent drawing
  • US9038134B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A. method is used in managing predictions in data security systems. An authentication request is received from an entity for access to a computerized resource. A predictor is determined based on context data for the authentication request and the entity. The authentication request is managed based on the predictor and the context data.