Predictive Audio Coding Error Recovery for Stable Sound Location

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Predictive coding schemes in stereo and multichannel audio encoding are sensitive to errors, leading to error propagation and unwanted changes in the perceived location of sound sources, especially in stable audio scenes, and existing remedies consume bandwidth even in error-free channels.

Innovation Solution

A method and decoder that use parameter memory to replace decoded parameters when errors are detected, determining the stability and concentration of sound sources in a subset of channels, and activating parameter recovery to reduce error propagation without redundant transmission.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of energy

If predictive coding schemes are used to reduce bandwidth consumption, then bandwidth efficiency is improved, but error propagation and unwanted changes in perceived sound source location occur when errors are detected

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebandwidth consumptionVSAvoiderror propagation
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary analysis of sound source stability and concentration before error recovery activation. By pre-evaluating whether the sound source is stable and concentrated in a subset of channels, the system prepares to switch to parameter memory replacement only when appropriate, avoiding unnecessary bandwidth consumption while protecting against error propagation in vulnerable scenarios

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically changes the coding parameter selection based on detected error conditions and sound source characteristics. When errors are detected and the sound source is determined to be stable and concentrated, the system switches from using transmitted predictive parameters to using parameters from memory, thereby changing the operational state to eliminate error propagation while maintaining bandwidth efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If parameter recovery is activated to replace decoded parameters with stored parameters, then error propagation is reduced, but bandwidth is wasted in error-free channels

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveerror propagationVSAvoidbandwidth consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts the error recovery mechanism based on real-time detection of error conditions and sound source characteristics. The parameter recovery is not continuously activated but rather switched on/off based on whether errors are present and whether the sound source is stable and concentrated, making the system adaptive rather than static

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses parameter copies from memory to replace decoded parameters only when necessary. By maintaining parameter memory as a backup copy and selectively using it during error conditions with stable, concentrated sound sources, the system avoids the overhead of continuous parameter transmission while ensuring reliability when needed

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Loss of energy

If transmitted parameters are used in predictive coding mode, then bandwidth efficiency is improved, but unnatural sound shifts occur during stable audio scenes when errors are detected

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebandwidth consumptionVSAvoidsound source location stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes the operational parameter source from transmitted predictive parameters to memory-based parameters when errors are detected and the sound source is determined to be stable and concentrated. This parameter switching eliminates the unnatural sound shifts caused by erroneous predictive parameters while maintaining bandwidth efficiency by not continuously transmitting redundant parameters

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms that monitor error conditions and sound source characteristics (stability and concentration) to determine when parameter recovery should be activated. This feedback loop ensures that parameter replacement occurs only when it will improve sound source location stability, avoiding unnecessary changes that could introduce artifacts

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentEP4664452A1Method and apparatus for low cost error recovery in predictive coding
Publication Date: 2025.12.17 TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET LM ERICSSON (PUBL)
  • EP4664452A1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4664452A1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4664452A1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

Methods, apparatuses, decoders, and computer programs for audio coding are provided. Responsive to a bad frame being indicated, it is determined that a parameter memory is corrupted. Responsive to a bad frame not being indicated decoding multichannel parameters. Responsive to the parameter memory being corrupted, it is determined, based on the location measure, whether the reconstructed sound source is stable and predominantly concentrated in a subset of channels of multichannels of the received multichannel signal. Responsive to the reconstructed sound source being concentrated in the subset of channels of the multichannels and being stable, replacing decoded multichannel parameters with stored multichannel parameters.