Predictive Beam Refinement for Low-Latency NR Beam Selection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Beam management in NR systems consumes significant resources and causes latency due to beam sweeping and measurement operations, especially at high frequencies, which can be improved through AI/ML-based predictive beam refinement.

Innovation Solution

Implementing AI/ML models at WTRUs and network nodes for predictive beam refinement, using configuration information to train models based on beam sweeping, identify optimal beams, and adjust thresholds for measurement storage and model retraining.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If beam sweeping and measurement operations are performed to identify suitable beams, then beam selection accuracy is improved, but resource consumption and latency increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebeam selection accuracyVSAvoidlatency
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary beam sweeping and stores measurement results in buffers before actual beam selection is needed. Training data samples are collected and stored in advance, allowing the AI/ML model to make quick predictions without performing full beam sweeping at the moment of decision, thus reducing latency while maintaining accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of performing actual beam sweeping operations repeatedly, the system uses stored training data samples that replicate the measurement information. The AI/ML model processes these copied data representations to predict beam quality, avoiding the time-consuming physical measurement process while preserving the essential selection criteria

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Adaptability or versatility

If beam sweeping is performed across many beams at high frequencies, then comprehensive beam coverage is achieved, but resource consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebeam coverageVSAvoidresource consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The AI/ML model serves multiple functions: it predicts beam quality, determines when retraining is needed, manages buffer storage, and handles threshold comparisons. This multi-functional approach consolidates what would otherwise require separate processing systems, reducing overall resource consumption while maintaining comprehensive beam coverage capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically changes parameters such as buffer size thresholds and retraining triggers based on stored measurement data. By adjusting these parameters adaptively rather than using fixed conservative values, the system achieves comprehensive beam coverage only when necessary, optimizing resource usage while maintaining versatility

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If AI/ML models are trained with extensive beam measurement data, then prediction accuracy is improved, but training complexity and overhead increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprediction accuracyVSAvoidtraining complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses a buffer size threshold to determine when enough training data has been collected. Rather than requiring exhaustive data collection, the system proceeds with training when the buffer reaches a sufficient threshold level, achieving good prediction accuracy without the excessive complexity of complete data set preparation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms where the AI/ML model's performance and the buffer status inform when retraining should occur. This feedback loop allows the system to maintain accuracy by retraining only when necessary, rather than continuously, thus reducing training complexity and overhead while preserving prediction quality

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20260019176A1Methods and procedures for predictive beam refinement
Publication Date: 2026.01.15 INTERDIGITAL PATENT HOLDINGS INC
  • US20260019176A1 patent drawing
  • US20260019176A1 patent drawing
  • US20260019176A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A wireless transmit/receive unit (WTRU) may be configured to receive a configuration for predictive beam refinement. The configuration may include at least one threshold. The at least one threshold may be related to information. The information may be used to predict and/or select one or more beam-pairs. The WTRU may perform measurements on one or more reference signal (RS) sets. The WTRU may determine to store one or more of the measurements, for example as training data samples in a memory. The WTRU may determine to store the one or more measurements based on a comparison of the one or more measurements against the at least one threshold. The WTRU may determine to begin training or retraining a model for performing a prediction related to the one or more beam pairs. The WTRU may transmit an indication that the stored training data samples have reached the at least one threshold.