Predictive Block Allocation for Adaptive Garbage Collection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current storage systems face inefficiencies in garbage collection, which can hinder host performance and increase memory usage, as they lack predictive methods to determine optimal block allocation based on usage scenarios, leading to suboptimal garbage collection schedules.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a predictive block allocation method that uses machine learning and pattern matching to differentiate between usage scenarios, adjusting block allocation and garbage collection thresholds to allocate blocks closer to needing garbage collection in high-usage scenarios, thereby optimizing garbage collection operations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If traditional garbage collection is used without predictive block allocation, then the storage system can maintain simple block management, but garbage collection efficiency deteriorates and memory over-provisioning increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegarbage collection efficiencyVSAvoidblock allocation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by predicting future usage scenarios and pre-allocating blocks accordingly. The controller analyzes historical access patterns and forecasts future write operations, then proactively allocates blocks before they are actually needed, reducing the urgency and frequency of garbage collection operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The block allocation strategy dynamically adapts to changing usage scenarios. The system transitions between different allocation methods based on real-time analysis of access patterns, switching from sequential allocation for random writes to wear-leveling allocation for sequential writes, optimizing garbage collection efficiency for each scenario.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If blocks are allocated farther from needing garbage collection, then memory endurance is improved through wear leveling, but garbage collection latency increases and performance deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvememory enduranceVSAvoidgarbage collection latency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts block allocation distance based on the predicted usage scenario. For random write patterns, blocks are allocated closer to the host to reduce GC latency. For sequential write patterns, blocks are allocated farther away to maximize wear leveling and extend memory endurance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The allocation parameters such as block distance and wear-leveling factors are changed based on the predicted usage scenario. The system modifies these parameters dynamically to balance between endurance and performance requirements for different workloads.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If more memory is allocated for garbage collection operations, then garbage collection throughput is improved, but memory over-provisioning increases and capacity is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegarbage collection throughputVSAvoidavailable memory capacity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary garbage collection operations by predicting which blocks will become full soon and proactively collecting data from those blocks before they reach capacity. This prevents the need to allocate excessive memory specifically for GC operations, as collections are performed continuously in the background based on predictions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The storage system serves itself by using predictive analytics to identify and collect data from blocks that need garbage collection, reducing the need for additional memory resources. The system monitors its own block utilization and performs self-optimization without requiring excessive over-provisioning.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS11269764B2Storage system and method for adaptive scheduling of background operations
Publication Date: 2022.03.08 SANDISK TECHNOLOGIES LLC
  • US11269764B2 patent drawing
  • US11269764B2 patent drawing
  • US11269764B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A storage system and method for adaptive scheduling of background operations are provided. In one embodiment, after a storage system completes a host operation in the memory, the storage system remains in a high power mode for a period of time, after which the storage system enters a low-power mode. The storage system estimates whether there will be enough time to perform a background operation in the memory during the period of time without the background operation being interrupted by another host operation. In response to estimating that there will be enough time to perform the background operation in the memory without the background operation being interrupted by another host operation, the storage system performs the background operation in the memory.