Predictive Charging Controller for IMD Overheating

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Implantable medical devices (IMDs) face overheating issues during charging due to rapid energy input, leading to potential tissue damage and inefficient battery usage in external chargers, as excess energy is transmitted even when rejected by the IMD.

Innovation Solution

A charging energy control system that includes an IMD and an external charger with a charging controller to predict and cease or reduce energy transmission during predicted rejection periods, preventing overheating and conserving energy by distinguishing between charging acceptance and rejection periods.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Speed

If charging energy is transmitted quickly to the IMD, then charging speed is improved, but the temperature of the IMD increases to dangerous levels causing tissue damage

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecharging speedVSAvoidIMD temperature
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSTemperature

Solution Approach 1:

The external charger predicts future charging rejection periods based on past IMD charging behavior patterns. By anticipating when the IMD will reject charging energy, the charger can proactively reduce or cease energy transmission before rejection occurs, preventing temperature escalation and tissue damage while maintaining efficient charging during acceptance periods

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors IMD charging acceptance and rejection patterns, using this feedback to adjust charging energy transmission in real-time. The charger modifies its energy output based on observed IMD responses, creating a closed-loop control system that optimizes charging speed while preventing overheating

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Productivity

If charging energy is transmitted rapidly, then charging efficiency is improved, but energy is wasted as heat due to eddy currents in the metal can

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecharging efficiencyVSAvoidenergy wasted as heat
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

By predicting charging rejection periods in advance based on historical charging patterns, the external charger can reduce energy transmission before the IMD rejects the energy. This prevents energy from being converted to heat through eddy currents in the metal can during rejection periods, thereby reducing energy waste while maintaining efficient charging during acceptance periods

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If the external charger transmits charging energy continuously, then charging capability is maintained, but the battery of the external charger is depleted

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecharging capabilityVSAvoidexternal charger battery consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The external charger operates in periodic cycles, transmitting charging energy during predicted acceptance periods and ceasing or reducing transmission during predicted rejection periods. This periodic on-off charging pattern maintains the charging capability when the IMD needs energy while conserving the external charger's battery life by avoiding continuous energy transmission during rejection periods

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution effectively reduces the risk of IMD overheating and conserves energy in both the IMD and the external charger by optimizing energy transmission based on predicted rejection periods, enhancing safety and battery life.

Implementation Method 1

an external charger that transmits charging energy into the IMDs, such as through radio frequency (RF) signals

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic induction: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 2

The IMD typically includes a pre-regulator that accepts the charging energy when the internal battery requires charging, but rejects the charging energy when the battery is charged to an acceptable or full level

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrical regulation:

Implementation Method 3

Some of the charging energy available to the IMD is often wasted as heat, which may be caused by eddy currents in the metal can or case of the IMD

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEddy currents: Eddy Currents

Implementation Method 4

If charging energy is input into the IMD too quickly, the temperature of the IMD may increase to dangerous levels and may cause tissue damage

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectJoule heating: Joule Heating

Data Source

PatentUS9270137B2System and method for controlling charging energy delivered to an implantable medical device
Publication Date: 2016.02.23 ADVANCED NEUROMODULATION SYSTEMS INC
  • US9270137B2 patent drawing
  • US9270137B2 patent drawing
  • US9270137B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A charging energy control system includes an implantable medical device (IMD) and an external charger. The IMD receives charging energy to recharge a battery during a charging energy acceptance period and rejects the charging energy during an actual charging energy rejection period. The external charger transmits the charging energy to the IMD in order to recharge the battery. The external charger includes a charging controller configured to determine the actual charging energy rejection period, and regulate the charging energy during which the charging controller predicts a predicted charging energy rejection period of the IMD based on the actual recharging energy rejection period. The charging controller is configured to cease or reduce transmission of the charging energy during a charging energy conservation period that is at least a portion of the predicted charging energy rejection period.