Regression-Optimization Predictive Control for Nonlinear Process Constraints

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing model predictive control methods struggle with process dynamics and non-linearity in manufacturing and processing industries, requiring complex constraints that are not effectively addressed by approximate dynamic programming, Markov decision processes, and reinforcement learning.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method using multiple step look-ahead regression models with tuned look-back windows, generating optimization constraints and variables, and solving an optimization model to produce actions through a rolling horizon procedure.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If model predictive control uses first principles system models with local linearization, then it can handle process dynamics, but it requires complex constraints and simplifications that reduce accuracy

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocess stabilityVSAvoidmodel complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces traditional first principles system models with data-driven regression models trained on historical process data. This substitution eliminates the need for complex analytical models and local linearization, while capturing non-linear process dynamics through learned relationships from data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates simplified copies of complex process dynamics through regression models that replicate system behavior without requiring underlying physical principles. These models capture essential dynamics while being computationally tractable for real-time control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Extent of automation

If approximate dynamic programming, Markov decision process, or reinforcement learning techniques are used, then automation is improved, but they have limited ability to consume complex constraints

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomated controlVSAvoidconstraint handling capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the control problem into two parts: data-driven regression models capture process dynamics while separate optimization constraints explicitly handle complex operational constraints. This segmentation allows automated control to effectively consume and satisfy multiple constraints simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a universal optimization framework that can handle diverse constraint types (equality, inequality, integer, binary) within a single mathematical programming formulation, making the automated control system versatile across different process constraints.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Ease of manufacture

If traditional control methods are used for non-linear processes, then implementation is simpler, but they cannot effectively address process dynamics and non-linearity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimplementation easeVSAvoidprocess control performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent substitutes traditional control theory approaches with data-driven regression models that automatically adapt to non-linear process dynamics. This substitution maintains implementation simplicity through standard machine learning workflows while dramatically improving control performance for non-linear processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS12417412B2Automated model predictive control using a regression-optimization framework for sequential decision making
Publication Date: 2025.09.16 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION
  • US12417412B2 patent drawing
  • US12417412B2 patent drawing
  • US12417412B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A computer-implemented method, computer program product, and computer system for automated model predictive control. The computer system trains multiple step look-ahead regression models, using historical states and historical actions for a to-be-optimized system, for each timestep of a past time horizon. Regression models may be either linear or nonlinear in order to capture process dynamics and nonlinearity. The computer system generates optimization constraints for each timestep of a future time horizon. The computer system generates optimization variables, based on the multiple step look-ahead regression models, for each timestep of the future time horizon. The computer system constructs a mixed integer linear programming based optimization model that includes an objective function, the optimization constraints, and the optimization variables. Nonlinear regression models are converted into piecewise linear approximation functions. The computer system solves the optimization model to produce actions for the to-be-optimized system, over the future time horizon, and recommend commitment-look-ahead actions.