Predictive Cow Rearing Feedback for Automated Individual Management

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The livestock industry faces challenges in implementing individual management and production planning due to high labor demands and an aging workforce, leading to inefficiencies and adverse impacts on animal welfare and production levels, particularly in managing temperature-related milk production fluctuations.

Innovation Solution

A feedback system and method that includes sensors to acquire current and future information about cow rearing states, an AI model to predict future conditions, and generate feedback for users and rearing devices to optimize feeding and care practices.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If large-scale production is implemented to maintain production levels, then productivity increases, but labor demands increase and working environment load increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction levelsVSAvoidworking environment load
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables automatic individual management of cows through automated monitoring and feedback mechanisms. Sensors continuously collect data on cow weight, temperature, and behavior, and the system automatically generates feedback without requiring manual labor for each cow, thus maintaining productivity while reducing working environment load

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

Manual monitoring and management of individual cows is replaced by an automated electronic system using sensors, processors, and communication networks. The mechanical/manual processes of weighing, temperature monitoring, and behavior observation are substituted with electronic sensing and automated data processing

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Reliability

If individual management is implemented for large-scale production, then animal welfare is improved, but labor demands and working environment load increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveanimal welfareVSAvoidworking environment load
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

Each cow is equipped with or monitored by individual sensors that automatically track its health metrics including weight, temperature, and behavior. The system provides automated alerts and feedback when anomalies are detected, enabling individualized care without increasing manual labor requirements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors individual cow parameters and provides real-time feedback to farmers through displays or mobile devices. This automated feedback loop enables timely intervention for individual animals, improving welfare outcomes while reducing the need for constant manual checking

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Productivity

If production planning is implemented to balance demand with production, then milk production efficiency is improved, but complexity of management increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemilk production efficiencyVSAvoidmanagement complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system collects data on individual cow production levels, seasonal temperature variations, and historical patterns, then processes this information to generate automated production forecasts and recommendations. This feedback mechanism helps farmers plan production to match demand while accounting for seasonal fluctuations, improving efficiency without requiring complex manual analysis

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses historical data and environmental factors to predict future milk production levels in advance. By providing preliminary information about expected production surpluses or shortages, the system enables farmers to plan accordingly before the actual production events occur, balancing supply with demand

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS20250287926A1Feedback device, rearing system, feedback method, and program
Publication Date: 2025.09.18 SEIKO EPSON CORP
  • US20250287926A1 patent drawing
  • US20250287926A1 patent drawing
  • US20250287926A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A feedback device includes a first acquisition unit configured to acquire first information including current information indicating a current rearing state of a cow, a second acquisition unit configured to acquire second information including at least one of future information indicating a future rearing state of the cow and an ideal condition indicating a condition ideal for rearing of the cow, and a feedback execution unit configured to execute feedback relating to the rearing to at least one of a user and a rearing device for rearing the cow. The feedback execution unit includes a generation unit configured to generate feedback information for the feedback by using the first information and the second information, and an output unit configured to output the feedback information.