Predictive Crowdsourcing Endpoint Protection System

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current malware detection systems, particularly signature-based and anomaly-based detection methods, face challenges in identifying unknown or obfuscated malware, leading to high false positive and false negative rates, and are reactive in nature, failing to proactively prevent infections.

Innovation Solution

A predictive crowdsourcing-based endpoint protection system that utilizes numerical weather prediction models and software behavior computation to build an anti-malware database, incorporating expert evaluation and deep learning to classify and predict malware, and implement proactive countermeasures such as hackback attempts.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If signature-based detection is used to identify known malware, then detection accuracy for known threats is improved, but the system cannot detect unknown or obfuscated malware and requires complex source code analysis

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection accuracyVSAvoidability to detect unknown malware
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by collecting and analyzing malware samples in advance to build threat signatures and behavioral models. Crowdsourced malware samples are gathered proactively, analyzed in controlled environments, and used to create detection signatures before actual threats encounter user systems. This preliminary analysis enables the system to detect both known and unknown malware variants effectively.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces an intermediary controlled environment between the malware source and user systems. Malware is first executed and analyzed in isolated virtual machines or sandboxes to observe its behavior, extract signatures, and build threat models. This intermediary layer enables safe analysis of obfuscated and polymorphic malware without risking user systems, bridging the gap between unknown threats and detection capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Adaptability or versatility

If anomaly-based detection is used to detect unknown malware, then the system can identify new threats, but false positive and false negative rates increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to detect new threatsVSAvoidfalse positive and false negative rates
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system merges multiple detection techniques including anomaly-based detection, signature-based detection, and crowdsourced intelligence. By combining these approaches, the system leverages the strengths of each method while compensating for their weaknesses. Anomaly detection identifies potential new threats, while signature matching and crowdsourced data validation reduce false positives and negatives through cross-verification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms where detection results, false positives, and false negatives are continuously fed back into the analysis pipeline. Crowdsourced validation provides feedback on suspected malware, allowing the system to refine its anomaly detection models and adjust thresholds. This feedback loop continuously improves reliability by learning from past detection errors and adapting to new threat patterns.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If traditional antivirus systems are used, then protection against known threats is provided, but the systems are reactive and fail to proactively prevent infections

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprotection against known threatsVSAvoidresponse time to new threats
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by continuously collecting and analyzing malware samples in advance of actual threats. Crowdsourced malware submissions are analyzed proactively in controlled environments, and threat intelligence is gathered before infections occur. This enables the system to prepare detection signatures and warnings ahead of time, transitioning from reactive to proactive threat prevention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables self-service through automated analysis of crowdsourced malware samples. When new malware is submitted by users or detected in the wild, the system automatically analyzes it in isolated environments, extracts signatures, and updates protection databases without requiring manual intervention. This self-service capability accelerates response time and enables proactive detection of emerging threats.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS11431748B2Predictive crowdsourcing-based endpoint protection system
Publication Date: 2022.08.30 NSOULI MOUNIR TALAL
  • US11431748B2 patent drawing
  • US11431748B2 patent drawing
  • US11431748B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A three-component computer security system focused around crowdsourcing. Users may install the software, at which point it may access the users' computers or hosts, identify certain behaviors as suspicious, and ask for confirmation from the user. The user may then manually edit the report to remove or add behaviors. The system may then prepare a report to deliver to a central system, which may perform malware detection, expert evaluation, and deep learning on the received reports. When the host program's assessment and the user's assessment conflict, the program may be flagged for expert analysis. This use of crowdsourced information may then be used to develop detection, mitigation, and prediction protocols, which may be based on machine learning, and may further be used to manage hackbacks if authorized and desired.