Predictive Daylight Harvesting With Feedback Lighting Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current daylight harvesting systems are inefficient due to reliance on basic rules of thumb for design, lack of suitable simulation tools for complex systems, and often operate in open loop mode without feedback, resulting in suboptimal energy savings and occupant comfort.

Innovation Solution

A predictive daylight harvesting system that uses a combination of sensors, mathematical models, and artificial intelligence to simulate and optimize daylight usage based on historical data, current weather conditions, and occupant behavior, allowing for real-time adjustments to electric lighting and fenestration to maximize energy savings while maintaining comfortable environments.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If basic rules of thumb are used for daylight harvesting system design, then the system is simple to implement, but energy savings are suboptimal

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of system designVSAvoidenergy savings
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary simulation and prediction of daylight harvesting performance before actual implementation. By using historical weather data and mathematical models to predict future daylight conditions, the system optimizes control strategies in advance, achieving energy savings without complex real-time adjustments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates feedback loops that continuously monitor actual daylight conditions, photosensor readings, and energy consumption. This feedback is used to refine predictions and adjust control strategies, progressively improving energy savings while maintaining system simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Ease of operation

If open loop mode operation is used, then the system is easy to operate, but occupant comfort is compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of system operationVSAvoidoccupant comfort
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically adjusts lighting and fenestration controls based on predicted daylight conditions without requiring manual intervention. It self-regulates to maintain optimal illuminance levels, providing both ease of operation and reliable occupant comfort through autonomous decision-making.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses feedback from photosensors and occupancy detection to automatically adjust lighting levels, ensuring comfort is maintained without user intervention. The closed-loop control responds to actual conditions while maintaining simple operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Productivity

If complex simulation tools are developed, then system optimization is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem optimization capabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system introduces a predictive simulation model as an intermediary between simple control rules and complex system behavior. This mathematical model layer translates basic inputs into optimized control strategies, achieving high productivity without requiring the full complexity of detailed simulation tools.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system optimizes performance by dynamically adjusting control parameters based on predicted conditions rather than changing the fundamental system architecture. This allows sophisticated optimization while maintaining relatively simple device complexity through parameter-based control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables interactive simulation and self-tuning of daylight harvesting systems to achieve annual energy savings of 40-50% while ensuring occupant comfort and optimal plant growth conditions, by accurately predicting and responding to solar insolation and occupant behavior.

Implementation Method 1

Measurement data from one or more photosensors is obtained that provides measurements of an initial distribution of direct and interreflected radiation within the environment

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhotoelectric Effect: Photoelectric Effect

Data Source

PatentUS9955552B2Predictive daylight harvesting system
Publication Date: 2018.04.24 SUNTRACKER TECH
  • US9955552B2 patent drawing
  • US9955552B2 patent drawing
  • US9955552B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In an example, an expected sky condition is calculated for a geographic location, a time of day, and a date based on a mathematical model. A predicted distribution of direct and interreflected solar radiation within the environment is calculated based on the expected sky condition. Measurement data from one or more photosensors is obtained that provides measurements of an initial distribution of direct and interreflected radiation within the environment, including radiation from solar and electrical lighting sources. A target distribution of direct and interreflected artificial electromagnetic radiation produced by electrical lighting is determined, based on the measurement data and the predicted distribution of direct and interreflected solar radiation, to achieve the target distribution of direct and interreflected radiation within the environment. Output parameters are set to one or more devices to modify the initial distribution to achieve the target distribution of direct and interreflected radiation within the environment.