Predictive Double-Booking System for Medical Appointment Slots

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional automated reminder systems lack sufficient technical features to effectively identify and mitigate no-shows in medical appointments, leading to lost revenue and delayed patient care due to unused appointment slots.

Innovation Solution

A predictive double-booking system that assesses risk scores for appointment slots using patient and clinic data, allowing for targeted double-booking of high-risk slots to minimize no-shows by identifying and flagging high-risk periods for additional patient scheduling.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional automated reminder systems are used to reduce no-shows, then patient appointment attendance may improve, but the system lacks the capability to effectively identify high-risk appointment slots, resulting in continued revenue loss and wasted capacity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveappointment attendanceVSAvoidno-show risk identification
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary risk assessment for appointment slots before patients are scheduled. By calculating no-show probabilities in advance using historical data and patient characteristics, the system identifies high-risk slots proactively, allowing providers to take preventive actions such as double-booking or targeted reminders before the appointment occurs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously updates no-show risk predictions by incorporating actual appointment outcomes (no-shows, cancellations, arrivals) into the historical data. This feedback loop refines the predictive model over time, improving the accuracy of risk identification and enabling more effective targeted interventions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Productivity

If appointment slots are left unused due to predicted no-shows, then provider capacity is wasted and revenue is lost, but if slots are filled with additional patients, then wait times may increase and patient experience may deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprovider capacity utilizationVSAvoidpatient wait time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies different scheduling strategies to different appointment slots based on their individual no-show risk profiles. High-risk slots are targeted for double-booking or intensive reminder campaigns, while low-risk slots maintain standard scheduling. This localized approach ensures capacity is optimized where needed without unnecessarily increasing wait times for all patients.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements partial double-booking only for high-risk appointment slots rather than universally. By applying the double-booking strategy selectively to slots with predicted no-show probabilities above a certain threshold, the system recovers capacity where most needed while minimizing the impact on patient wait times and experience.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Productivity

If targeted double-booking is implemented for high-risk slots, then revenue loss from no-shows is reduced and capacity is optimized, but the system complexity increases requiring integration of predictive modeling and scheduling systems

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverevenue recoveryVSAvoidsystem integration complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system is designed to integrate multiple functions within a unified platform: predictive risk assessment, appointment scheduling, patient communication, and performance tracking. By combining these functions into a single system rather than separate standalone tools, the patent reduces overall system complexity while achieving revenue recovery through targeted double-booking.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Quantity of substance

If general automated reminder systems are distributed to all patients, then reminder coverage is comprehensive, but the system cannot differentiate between high-risk and low-risk patients, resulting in inefficient resource allocation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereminder coverageVSAvoidtargeted intervention capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system sends reminder communications with different content, timing, and intensity to different patient groups based on their individual no-show risk profiles. High-risk patients receive more frequent and personalized reminders, while low-risk patients receive standard reminders. This differentiated approach maintains comprehensive coverage while efficiently allocating communication resources.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS20230214784A1Systems and methods for a predictive double-booking medical appointment system
Publication Date: 2023.07.06 DIGNITY HEALTH
  • US20230214784A1 patent drawing
  • US20230214784A1 patent drawing
  • US20230214784A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Various embodiments of a predictive double-booking system for use in medical appointment booking applications are described herein.