Predictive ML System for Early Dropout Identification

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current school division interventions to address student dropout are reactive, focusing on academic performance, behavioral issues, and attendance after problems have arisen, failing to identify and address the root causes effectively.

Innovation Solution

A predictive logic model using machine learning to assess program participants, identifying attributes that contribute to desired or undesired outcomes, and generating data-driven interventions tailored to individual participants based on their unique attributes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional reactive interventions are implemented after academic performance, behavior, or attendance problems occur, then interventions can be targeted to specific issues, but the root causes remain unaddressed and student outcomes are not significantly improved

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveidentification accuracyVSAvoidintervention timing
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary identification of at-risk students using machine learning analysis of multiple data strands before problems fully manifest. By predicting dropout risk early in the student journey, the system enables proactive interventions that address root causes before they escalate into academic performance, behavioral, or attendance issues, rather than reacting after problems occur

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system prepares intervention strategies in advance by identifying risk patterns and predicting which students are likely to encounter difficulties. This allows schools to have pre-planned support mechanisms ready to deploy, cushioning students against potential negative outcomes before they occur rather than responding after problems arise

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

2Device complexity

If only three traditional KPIs (academic performance, behavior, attendance) are monitored, then data collection is simple and manageable, but the root causes of student problems are not identified and interventions have limited effectiveness

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem complexityVSAvoidintervention effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments student data into multiple distinct strands including academic performance, behavioral records, attendance engagement, and additional predictive indicators. By dividing the comprehensive assessment into separable data categories, the system can analyze each strand independently while synthesizing them to form a holistic view of student risk factors, enabling more effective identification of root causes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The machine learning model serves multiple functions simultaneously: it analyzes various data strands, identifies patterns across different student populations, predicts dropout risk, and generates actionable insights. This multi-functional approach allows a single system to handle diverse data types and provide comprehensive student support rather than requiring separate systems for each function

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS20250148307A1Predictive machine learning system for early identification and recommendation of strategic interventions to improve participant outcomes
Publication Date: 2025.05.08 CANADAY DEVIN
  • US20250148307A1 patent drawing
  • US20250148307A1 patent drawing
  • US20250148307A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and method are presented in this invention for a machine learning model configured to generate recommendations to improve the probability of a desired outcome for participants in a program. Individual profile data for past and current participants, which includes participant attributes derived internal and external to the program, are used to conduct a series of assessments of the participant population to determine the probability of participants to achieve the desired outcome(s). Inputs to the assessments include the output(s) of the previous assessment(s) conducted in the series. Past participants with the undesired and desired results are assessed to identify detrimental and beneficial impactors to teach the system about the specific participant population(s) based on the plurality of attributes within the participant profiles. Individually tailored recommendations are automatically generated for current participants as a function of the identified impactors and tracked to further refine future recommendations generated by the system.