Predictive Energy Balancing in Power Conversion Regulators

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional power conversion regulators face challenges with high efficiency, noise reduction, and stability due to the introduction of additional inaccuracies and electromagnetic interference (EMI) from large output filter capacitors, especially with the advent of low ESR capacitors which can cause oscillation and require complex compensation schemes, and are often limited in their range of applicability and transient response.

Innovation Solution

A power-conversion regulator that includes an inductive reactor, an output filter reactor, and a switch, with computation circuitry responsive to the flux in the inductive reactor, output voltage, and load current to predict and regulate energy supply accurately, allowing for the use of low ESR capacitors and minimizing ripple and EMI, while adapting to varying load and capacitance conditions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Stability of the object's composition

If large output filter capacitors are used to filter ripple and absorb load changes, then ripple filtering is improved, but device size, cost, and resistance to voltage control increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveripple filteringVSAvoiddevice size and cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the ripple filtering function from the large output filter capacitor and relocates it to the control loop through impedance shaping. The feedback network is designed to provide frequency-dependent impedance that mimics the filtering effect of large capacitors without requiring them physically. This separates the energy storage function (performed by small capacitors) from the ripple filtering function (performed by the control loop).

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical/electrical filtering system (large physical capacitors) with a control-theoretic system (impedance shaping through feedback). Instead of using passive RC filtering components, the invention uses active control through the feedback network to achieve the same filtering effect in the electrical domain, substituting physical filtering with control-based filtering.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Stability of the object's composition

If low ESR capacitors are used to reduce ripple, then ripple is reduced, but stability is compromised causing oscillation

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproverippleVSAvoidstability
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the impedance parameters of the feedback network to compensate for the low ESR capacitor characteristics. By adjusting the feedback network components (R1, R2, C1, C2) to create specific impedance characteristics, the system maintains stability with low ESR capacitors. The feedback network introduces phase and gain adjustments that counteract the destabilizing effect of low ESR, allowing the system to achieve both low ripple and stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses feedback through a specifically designed network (R1, R2, C1, C2) to monitor and correct the output voltage. The feedback network provides frequency-dependent gain and phase adjustment that stabilizes the system when low ESR capacitors are used. The feedback mechanism detects oscillation tendencies and automatically adjusts the control signal to prevent instability, enabling the use of low ESR capacitors without sacrificing reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If complex compensation schemes are added to stabilize regulators with low ESR capacitors, then stability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovestabilityVSAvoidcompensation scheme complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the compensation function with the existing feedback network components. Instead of adding separate compensation circuits or stages, the invention integrates impedance shaping directly into the voltage feedback network using standard components (R1, R2, C1, C2). The same feedback path that provides voltage regulation also provides stability compensation, eliminating the need for additional dedicated compensation circuitry and reducing overall device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The feedback network is designed to perform multiple functions simultaneously: voltage regulation, ripple filtering, and stability compensation. The impedance-shaping feedback network serves as a universal solution that addresses all three concerns with a single integrated approach, rather than requiring separate circuits for each function. This multi-functionality reduces the overall complexity compared to traditional approaches that use dedicated compensation stages.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Manufacturing precision

If traditional feedback loops are used to control output voltage, then voltage regulation is achieved, but transient response is degraded

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevoltage regulationVSAvoidtransient response
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements preliminary action by having the feedback network anticipate and prepare for load changes. The impedance-shaping feedback provides leading phase compensation that allows the control loop to respond proactively to transient conditions. By shaping the frequency response to provide phase lead at critical frequencies, the system prepares the control signal in advance of actual load changes, reducing transient response time while maintaining accurate voltage regulation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution achieves minimal output ripple, excellent transient response, and reduced need for post-filtration, enabling efficient power conversion across a wide range of inputs and loads, even with unknown capacitance, and stabilizes the regulator without compromising transient performance.

Implementation Method 1

an inductive reactor for energy storage... As the inductive reactor is charged from an input energy source

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic Induction: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 2

the quantity of energy that must be supplied to a load and to an output filter capacitor to regulate the output voltage

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCapacitance: Capacitance

Data Source

PatentEP1920532B1Power conversion regulator with predictive energy balancing
Publication Date: 2016.08.31 COGNIPOWER LLC
  • EP1920532B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP1920532B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP1920532B1 patent drawingFigure 3a

AI summary

A power-conversion regulator comprising an inductive reactor, an output filter reactor, and a switch for admitting energy to the inductive reactor, additionally comprises computation circuitry responsive to the flux in the inductive reactor, to a reference signal, to an output voltage, and sometimes to an output load current, for computing the quantity of energy that must be supplied to a load and to the output filter reactor to regulate the output voltage or current to a desired relationship with the reference signal during each chopping waveform cycle driving the switch. As the inductive reactor is charged from an input energy source, the computation circuitry predicts whether the energy in the inductive reactor has become adequate for the regulation.