Predictive Fall Monitoring With Context-Aware Risk Forecasting

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current fall detection systems fail to accurately predict falls due to their reliance on constant, long-term risk assessments and lack of real-time, individualized monitoring, often failing to account for dynamic and context-dependent risk factors, and provide insufficient warning time to prevent falls.

Innovation Solution

A predictive fall event management system that utilizes a body-worn device and controller to assess time-varying physiological and contextual data, applying individualized learning and adaptive weightings to risk factors, enabling near-term fall predictions and generating proactive fall prevention outputs.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If constant long-term risk assessments are used, then system simplicity is maintained, but measurement precision of fall risk is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefall risk prediction accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system transitions from static long-term risk assessment to dynamic near-term risk assessment that continuously adapts to current physiological and contextual states. The risk model is updated in real-time based on monitored data, allowing the system to capture transient fall risk conditions that constant assessments would miss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The fall risk assessment is segmented into multiple time-varying risk factors (physiological factors, contextual factors, interaction factors) that are evaluated separately and then integrated. This segmentation allows precise measurement of each factor's contribution to overall fall risk while maintaining a structured system architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Measurement precision

If real-time individualized monitoring is implemented, then fall risk prediction accuracy is improved, but loss of time for data processing increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefall risk prediction accuracyVSAvoiddata processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary processing of physiological and contextual data as they are collected, preparing them for immediate integration into the fall risk model. This preliminary action reduces the computational burden during critical real-time assessment, minimizing data processing time while maintaining accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system maintains continuous monitoring and continuous risk assessment without interruption. Data collection, processing, and risk evaluation occur in an unbroken sequence, ensuring that fall risk predictions are always based on the most current information while maintaining efficient throughput.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

3Measurement precision

If dynamic context-dependent risk factors are accounted for, then fall risk prediction accuracy is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefall risk prediction accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses a unified fall risk model that handles multiple types of risk factors (physiological, contextual, interaction) through a single integrated framework. This multi-functional approach allows the system to account for diverse dynamic factors without requiring separate complex subsystems for each factor type.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts the parameters and weightings in the fall risk model based on the current state and relevance of different risk factors. This allows the model to adapt to varying conditions and account for context-dependent factors while maintaining a manageable level of complexity through parameter optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Loss of time

If near-term fall predictions are generated, then warning time is increased, but reliability of prediction may be reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewarning timeVSAvoidprediction reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system generates near-term predictions by continuously updating the fall risk model with current physiological and contextual data. This dynamic approach captures transient risk conditions that lead to falls, providing timely warnings while maintaining reliability through real-time data-driven adjustments to the prediction model.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates feedback loops where prediction results and actual fall events are used to continuously refine and validate the fall risk model. This feedback mechanism ensures that near-term predictions remain reliable by adjusting model parameters based on observed outcomes and improving prediction accuracy over time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS12484860B2Predictive fall event management system and method of using same
Publication Date: 2025.12.02 STARKEY LABORATORIES INC
  • US12484860B2 patent drawing
  • US12484860B2 patent drawing
  • US12484860B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Various embodiments of a predictive fall event management system and a method of using such system are disclosed. The system includes a body-worn device and a controller operatively connected to the body-worn device. The controller is adapted to receive physiological data representative of a physiological characteristic of a wearer of the body-worn device over a monitoring time period; receive contextual data representative of context information of the wearer over the monitoring time period; and determine one or more future physiological states or contextual states based at least in part on one or more of the physiological data and the contextual data. The controller is further adapted to determine, for a future time, whether a fall condition is satisfied based upon the one or more future physiological states or contextual states and generate a fall prevention output responsive to satisfaction of the fall condition.