Predictive Fault Indicators for Physical System Diagnosis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing supervision systems for complex physical systems face challenges in accurately diagnosing malfunctions due to sensor faults, as conventional redundancy mechanisms are costly and require precise knowledge of mathematical equations, which may not be available for complex systems.

Innovation Solution

A method and system using predictive models and a signature matrix to diagnose physical systems by generating fault indicators, where predictive models are trained on sensor measurements and a graph-based Dulmage-Mendelsohn decomposition is used to determine a signature matrix associating diagnostics and fault indicators.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If hardware redundancy (multiple sensors) is used to detect sensor failures, then reliability of fault detection is improved, but device complexity and cost increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefault detection reliabilityVSAvoidnumber of sensors
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates virtual copies of sensor measurements through predictive models. Instead of installing multiple physical sensors (hardware redundancy), the system uses machine learning models to generate predicted measurements that serve as virtual replicas. These predicted values are then compared with actual sensor readings to detect faults, achieving redundancy detection capability without the physical overhead of multiple sensors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical approach of hardware redundancy (multiple physical sensors) with an information-processing approach using predictive models. The system substitutes physical sensor multiplication with computational modeling, where machine learning algorithms generate expected sensor readings based on system state predictions, and fault detection is achieved through comparison rather than through additional hardware.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Measurement precision

If analytical redundancy with precise mathematical equations is used, then measurement quality is improved, but ease of manufacture worsens due to requirement of known equations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemeasurement qualityVSAvoidease of implementing supervision system
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transitions from requiring precise mathematical equations (rigid parameter specification) to using data-driven predictive models with learned parameters. Instead of needing known physical equations, the system trains machine learning models on operational data to learn the relationships between system states and sensor measurements. This changes the approach from equation-based analysis to model-based prediction, where parameters are learned rather than predetermined.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent substitutes the traditional approach of using known mathematical equations for analytical redundancy with machine learning-based predictive models. The system replaces equation-driven measurement analysis with data-driven prediction, where neural networks or other ML models learn the complex relationships in the system without requiring explicit mathematical formulations of the underlying physics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Reliability

If hardware redundancy is implemented to protect against sensor faults, then reliability is improved, but loss of time increases due to system complexity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprotection against sensor faultsVSAvoidtime for diagnosis and action
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary actions by continuously running predictive models to generate expected sensor readings before faults occur. The system maintains up-to-date predictions of system state and sensor values, so when a fault occurs, the comparison between predicted and actual readings immediately reveals the discrepancy. This pre-computation and continuous prediction enable rapid fault detection without the time delays associated with complex hardware redundancy analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS12423200B2Estimation of a diagnosis of a physical system by predicting fault indicators by machine learning
Publication Date: 2025.09.23 INSA TOULOUSE
  • US12423200B2 patent drawing
  • US12423200B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention relates to a diagnostic system (20) for diagnosing a physical system (10) comprising means for acquiring measurements (m1, m2, . . . , mS) provided by sensors (l1, l2, . . . , lS), for providing said measurements at the input of a set (22) of predictive models (M1, M2, M3, . . . , MN) each generating a fault indicator (r1, r2, r3, . . . , rN), then for determining a diagnosis of said physical system from said fault indicators and a signature matrix (24) associating diagnostics and fault indicators (r1, r2, r3, . . . , rN).