Predictive Field Mapping for Harvester Power Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Agricultural harvesters face performance degradation due to varying conditions such as dense crops, weeds, soil properties, and topography, which increase power demands and affect efficiency, as existing systems lack effective predictive control mechanisms to manage these factors in real-time.

Innovation Solution

The use of in-situ sensors and predictive mapping technology to generate predictive maps that anticipate power requirements based on agricultural characteristics like vegetative index, crop moisture, soil properties, and topography, enabling automated control adjustments during harvesting operations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If the harvester operates through fields with varying agricultural conditions (dense crops, weeds, soil properties, topography), then the harvester must process diverse crop conditions, but power demands increase and efficiency degrades

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to handle varying field conditionsVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary mapping of field conditions (crop density, moisture, topography, soil properties) before harvesting operations. This advance knowledge allows the harvester to pre-plan power allocation and operational parameters for different field zones, avoiding reactive power management that would consume more energy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The harvester dynamically adjusts operational parameters (header height, rotor speed, fan speed, ground speed) based on real-time feedback from field condition maps and actual crop conditions. This dynamic adaptation optimizes power consumption by matching engine output to actual processing requirements in different field zones.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Productivity

If the harvester processes dense crops and weeds, then harvesting completeness improves, but power demand increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveharvesting completenessVSAvoidpower demand
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSPower

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies different processing intensities to different field zones based on local crop conditions. In areas with dense crops or weeds, the system increases processing parameters (header height, rotor speed) to ensure complete harvesting. In lighter areas, parameters are reduced to conserve power, achieving local optimization of the productivity-power tradeoff.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Measurement precision

If real-time sensor data is collected and processed, then predictive control accuracy improves, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepredictive control accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system is segmented into modular components: in-situ sensors for data collection, separate mapping modules for spatial data processing, predictive modeling components for power requirement estimation, and control modules for actuator adjustment. This segmentation reduces overall system complexity while maintaining high measurement and predictive accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Productivity

If automated control adjustments are made based on predictive maps, then operational efficiency improves, but control system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational efficiencyVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements closed-loop feedback where in-situ sensors continuously monitor actual crop conditions and power consumption, compare them against predictive map expectations, and automatically adjust operational parameters. This feedback mechanism achieves automated efficiency improvements while using standardized control algorithms that manage system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS11864483B2Predictive map generation and control system
Publication Date: 2024.01.09 DEERE & CO
  • US11864483B2 patent drawing
  • US11864483B2 patent drawing
  • US11864483B2 patent drawing

AI summary

One or more information maps are obtained by an agricultural work machine. The one or more information maps map one or more agricultural characteristic values at different geographic locations of a field. An in-situ sensor on the agricultural work machine senses an agricultural characteristic as the agricultural work machine moves through the field. A predictive map generator generates a predictive map that predicts a predictive agricultural characteristic at different locations in the field based on a relationship between the values in the one or more information maps and the agricultural characteristic sensed by the in-situ sensor. The predictive map can be output and used in automated machine control.