Predictive Fraud Detection via AI Claim Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Catastrophic event preparedness is inadequate, leading to high damage costs and loss of life, and the insurance industry is plagued by inefficiencies and rampant fraud due to reactive and manual claim processing methods.

Innovation Solution

A computing system integrating machine learning, artificial intelligence, and data augmentation to provide predictive loss prevention and mitigation services, automate claim processing, and detect fraud by leveraging real-time data and historical information.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If reactive manual claim processing is used, then operational simplicity is maintained, but productivity is low and fraud detection is delayed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclaim processing efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary fraud detection and claim validation before final claim processing. Investigators and law enforcement proactively identify fraudulent behavior patterns and gather evidence prior to claim filing, enabling early intervention and preventing fraudulent claims from being processed

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

Manual investigative processes are replaced with automated machine learning models and AI systems that analyze claim data, detect fraud patterns, and generate investigative leads. This substitution dramatically increases processing speed and consistency while reducing manual labor requirements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Measurement precision

If proactive fraud detection systems are implemented, then fraud detection accuracy is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefraud detection accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The fraud detection system is divided into multiple specialized components including machine learning models for pattern recognition, AI systems for predictive analytics, and automated investigative tools. Each component handles specific aspects of fraud detection, allowing for high accuracy while managing complexity through modular architecture

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces automated investigative processes and third-party data sources as intermediaries between claimants and insurance companies. These intermediaries gather and verify information, reducing the complexity burden on the core insurance processing system while enhancing detection capabilities

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Productivity

If automated investigative processes are used, then productivity increases, but ease of operation decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinvestigation efficiencyVSAvoidoperational simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The automated investigative system operates autonomously, gathering data, analyzing patterns, and generating reports without requiring constant human intervention. The system serves itself by automatically updating models with new data and adjusting investigative strategies based on detected fraud patterns

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS20230113815A1Predictive fraud detection system
Publication Date: 2023.04.13 ASSURED INSURANCE TECH INC
  • US20230113815A1 patent drawing
  • US20230113815A1 patent drawing
  • US20230113815A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A computing system can remotely monitor, over one or more networks, a computing device of a potential claimant. Based at least in part on remotely monitoring the computing device, the computing system can generate a predictive fraud score for the claimant, the predictive fraud score indicating whether a subsequent claim filing by the potential claimant will include one or more fraudulent claims.