Predictive Harvest Control for Variable Stalk Diameter Fields

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Agricultural harvesters face challenges in efficiently harvesting crops due to varying stalk diameters in the field, which can lead to increased material other than grain (MOG) intake and grain loss if machine settings are not properly adjusted.

Innovation Solution

The use of in-situ sensors on agricultural work machines to detect stalk diameters and generate predictive maps that forecast stalk diameters at different locations in the field, allowing for real-time adjustments in machine settings such as deck plate spacing to optimize harvesting performance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If machine settings are kept fixed during harvesting, then operation simplicity is maintained, but grain loss and MOG intake increase due to varying stalk diameters

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperation simplicityVSAvoidgrain loss and MOG intake
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The harvester system dynamically adjusts machine settings (such as deck plate spacing, reel speed, and cutter bar height) in real-time based on sensed stalk diameter variations. This transforms the static, fixed-setting operation into a dynamic adaptive process that responds to changing field conditions, thereby reducing grain loss and MOG intake while maintaining ease of operation through automated control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs sensors to continuously monitor stalk diameter and provides feedback to the control system. This feedback loop enables automatic adjustment of harvesting parameters to match actual field conditions, resolving the contradiction by maintaining operational simplicity while significantly reducing substance loss through closed-loop control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Manufacturing precision

If machine settings are adjusted manually for each condition, then harvesting precision improves, but operator workload and time consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveharvesting precisionVSAvoidtime consumption for adjustments
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The harvester system performs self-adjustment of harvesting parameters based on automated sensing and control. The machine monitors stalk diameter variations and automatically modifies its settings without requiring manual intervention, thereby maintaining high harvesting precision while eliminating the time consumption associated with manual adjustments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces manual mechanical adjustment with automated electronic sensing and control. Sensors detect stalk diameter variations and the control system automatically adjusts mechanical parameters, substituting the time-consuming manual adjustment process with an automated system that maintains precision without increasing operator workload or time consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Productivity

If in-situ sensors and predictive maps are used, then harvesting performance improves, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveharvesting performanceVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system integrates multiple functions into a single unified platform: sensing stalk diameter, generating predictive maps, determining optimal settings, and executing adjustments. This multi-functional integration improves harvesting performance while managing device complexity by consolidating operations rather than adding separate independent systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system generates predictive maps of stalk diameter variations before harvesting begins and pre-determines optimal machine settings for different field zones. This preliminary action allows the harvester to operate with pre-optimized parameters, improving productivity while the complexity is managed through advance planning rather than real-time complex computations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS12320666B2Machine control using a predictive map
Publication Date: 2025.06.03 DEERE & CO
  • US12320666B2 patent drawing
  • US12320666B2 patent drawing
  • US12320666B2 patent drawing

AI summary

One or more information maps are obtained by an agricultural work machine. The one or more information maps map one or more agricultural characteristic values at different geographic locations of a field. An in-situ sensor on the agricultural work machine senses an agricultural characteristic as the agricultural work machine moves through the field. A predictive map generator generates a predictive map that predicts a predictive agricultural characteristic at different locations in the field based on a relationship between the values in the one or more information maps and the agricultural characteristic sensed by the in-situ sensor. The predictive map can be output and used in automated machine control.