Predictive Resolution of Indicia in Negotiable Instrument Images

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing systems face challenges in automatically reconciling negotiable instruments, such as checks, when irregularities like bad micro line reads or outdated check stock occur, leading to failures in matching documents to associated accounts, resulting in manual intervention and inefficiencies.

Innovation Solution

A system that uses optical character recognition (OCR) to extract metadata from negotiable instruments, retrieves historical transaction data to identify patterns, and determines values for unresolved indicia, enabling automated decision-making for exception processing and duplicate detection, thereby systematically resolving exceptions and eliminating duplicates.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If automated optical character recognition (OCR) is used to extract indicia from negotiable instruments, then processing speed and productivity are improved, but accuracy deteriorates when irregularities such as bad micro line reads or outdated check stock occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing speedVSAvoidindicia recognition accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary exception processing system that mediates between the OCR extraction process and the final reconciliation. When OCR fails to accurately extract indicia due to irregularities like bad micro line reads or outdated check stock, the system automatically detects these exceptions and routes them for alternative processing, preventing accuracy degradation from propagating through the entire system while maintaining high overall productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary validation and exception detection immediately after OCR extraction, before the indicia are used for account matching. This preliminary action identifies problematic extracts early, allowing the system to apply corrective measures or alternative extraction methods proactively, thereby maintaining both high processing speed and accurate indicia recognition.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Measurement precision

If manual intervention is used to resolve exceptions in negotiable instrument reconciliation, then accuracy is improved, but productivity and processing time deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereconciliation accuracyVSAvoidprocessing throughput
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The exception processing system is designed to be self-service, automatically detecting, classifying, and resolving exceptions without requiring manual intervention. The system uses multiple extraction methods, historical data analysis, and automated decision-making to resolve indicia extraction failures independently, thereby maintaining high reconciliation accuracy while preserving processing throughput and eliminating the productivity loss that would result from manual handling.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback loops where the results of exception processing are fed back into the reconciliation workflow. When exceptions are automatically resolved through alternative extraction methods or historical data matching, the resolved indicia are immediately used for account reconciliation, ensuring high accuracy is maintained without interrupting the processing flow and without requiring manual intervention that would reduce productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Measurement precision

If historical transaction data is analyzed to predict unresolved indicia values, then reconciliation accuracy is improved, but system complexity and processing time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveindicia value determination accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies partial action by using historical data analysis selectively only for specific exception cases where OCR extraction failed, rather than applying it to all transactions. This targeted approach improves accuracy for problematic cases while avoiding the excessive complexity and processing time that would result from analyzing historical data for every single transaction, thereby balancing accuracy improvement with system complexity management.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

4Reliability

If multiple extraction methods are implemented to handle exception cases, then reliability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing reliabilityVSAvoidsystem architecture complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements dynamic method selection, automatically choosing the most appropriate extraction method based on the specific characteristics of each negotiable instrument and the type of exception detected. Rather than statically configuring multiple extraction methods to always run, the system dynamically activates only the necessary methods, thereby improving processing reliability through method diversity while avoiding the complexity overhead of managing and executing all possible extraction methods for every transaction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS10229395B2Predictive determination and resolution of a value of indicia located in a negotiable instrument electronic image
Publication Date: 2019.03.12 BANK OF AMERICA CORP
  • US10229395B2 patent drawing
  • US10229395B2 patent drawing
  • US10229395B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Embodiments of the invention include systems, methods, and computer-program products for predictive determination and resolution of an exception located on a negotiable instrument. The exception may be an indicia that includes data related to the payor, payment accounts, or payee. An indicia may not be identified successfully and thus be queued for exception processing. The exceptions may include one or more irregularities such as bad micro line reads, outdated check stock, or misrepresentative indicia points on a negotiable instrument that may result in a failure to match the check to an account for processing. Upon identifying an exception, the system retrieves historical transaction data associated with the resolved indicia. Subsequently, utilizing the resolved indicia, the system may determine a value for the exception identified based on the retrieved historical transaction data. Finally, the determined value may be stored with the negotiable instrument to complete the payment reconciliation process.