Predictive User Input Deletion via Trained Model

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current speech recognition systems lack the ability to predictively and granularly manage user input data deletion, compromising user privacy as they rely on explicit user instructions rather than contextual and behavioral insights.

Innovation Solution

A system that employs a trained model to predictively recommend and manage the deletion of user input data based on characteristics such as content, context, subsequent user behavior, and patterns from similar users, allowing for automatic deletion with a deletion confidence score, enabling incremental learning to refine predictions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If explicit user instructions are required for data deletion, then user control and privacy are improved, but system complexity and processing requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser privacyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary analysis of user input characteristics, context, and behavioral patterns to predictively identify data that should be deleted before the user explicitly requests deletion. The trained model continuously monitors and evaluates input data properties, user behavior sequences, and contextual information to proactively flag sensitive information for deletion, eliminating the need for explicit user instructions while maintaining privacy protection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Productivity

If predictive deletion is implemented, then data management efficiency is improved, but measurement precision requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata management efficiencyVSAvoiddeletion accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback mechanisms where user responses to predictive deletion suggestions are collected and used to retrain the model. When the system predicts data should be deleted, it monitors user behavior to confirm or correct the prediction. This feedback loop continuously refines the trained model's accuracy in identifying sensitive data, improving measurement precision over time while maintaining high data management efficiency through automated predictive processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Speed

If real-time processing is required for predictive deletion, then responsiveness is improved, but energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing speedVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies partial processing by analyzing only the most relevant characteristics of user input, context, and behavioral patterns rather than processing all available data in real-time. The trained model efficiently filters and evaluates key features such as input content categories, temporal patterns, and user interaction sequences, enabling responsive predictive deletion decisions with reduced computational energy consumption compared to comprehensive real-time analysis of all data dimensions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS20240029730A1Predictive deletion of user input
Publication Date: 2024.01.25 AMAZON TECH INC
  • US20240029730A1 patent drawing
  • US20240029730A1 patent drawing
  • US20240029730A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Described are techniques for predicting when data associated with a user input is likely to be selected for deletion. The system may use a trained model to assist with such predictions. The trained model can be configured based on deletions associated with a user profile. An example process can including receiving user input data corresponding to the user profile, and processing the user input data to determine a user command. Based on characteristic data of the user command, the trained model can be used to determine that data corresponding to the user command is likely to be selected for deletion. The trained model can be iteratively updated based on additional user commands, including previously received user commands to delete user input data.