Predictive Lane Change Assistance Using Sensor Fusion

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current driver assistance systems are limited in their ability to autonomously analyze traffic situations and recommend or perform lane changes, relying on the driver's interpretation and action, which can lead to unsafe situations due to lack of concentration or experience.

Innovation Solution

A system that uses sensor data from radar, lidar, or image capturing units to predict the future movement behavior of other vehicles and determine the feasibility of lane changes, generating recommendation signals for the driver or enabling autonomous lane changes by adapting vehicle speed and steering.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the system relies on driver's interpretation and action to trigger lane change assistance, then the system complexity is reduced, but the safety and reliability deteriorate due to driver lack of concentration or experience

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary analysis of traffic situations and predicts future vehicle movements before the driver needs to react. The computing unit continuously monitors sensor data, evaluates traffic scenarios, and prepares lane change recommendations in advance, allowing the system to proactively assist the driver rather than merely reacting to driver inputs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system autonomously monitors the traffic environment, evaluates situations, and generates lane change recommendations without requiring continuous driver attention or interpretation. The driver assistance system independently processes sensor data from radar, lidar, and cameras to assess traffic conditions and provide safety-critical information to the driver.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Productivity

If the system reacts only to intended lane changes recognized by the driver, then the ease of operation is improved, but the productivity deteriorates as the system cannot assist in situations where the driver misses the opportunity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveassistance effectivenessVSAvoidoperation simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system continuously evaluates traffic situations and predicts future vehicle movements in advance, identifying suitable lane change opportunities before the driver would naturally consider them. This allows the system to present timely recommendations that the driver can act upon, rather than waiting for the driver to initiate the process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system provides continuous feedback to the driver through lane change recommendations based on its autonomous evaluation of traffic conditions. This feedback loop allows the driver to make informed decisions about lane changes, improving the overall effectiveness of the assistance system while maintaining simple operation through clear, timely information presentation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Measurement precision

If the system uses multiple sensors and predictive analysis, then the measurement precision is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprediction accuracyVSAvoidsensor system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system combines data from multiple sensor types (radar, lidar, cameras) and merges their information through a unified computing unit that performs predictive analysis. This integration allows the system to leverage the complementary strengths of different sensors - radar for velocity detection, lidar for precise positioning, and cameras for visual context - achieving high prediction accuracy through synergistic data fusion.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The computing unit serves multiple functions: it processes data from various sensor types, performs predictive analysis of vehicle movements, evaluates traffic scenarios, and generates lane change recommendations. This multi-functional approach consolidates complexity into a single processing platform rather than requiring separate dedicated systems for each function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentEP2942765B1Method and system for predictive lane change assistance, program software product and vehicle
Publication Date: 2018.12.26 HONDA RES INST EUROPE
  • EP2942765B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2942765B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2942765B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The invention relates to a system and method for assisting a driver of a host vehicle in potential lane change situations, corresponding software product and vehicle. The method comprises the steps of producing sensor data by at least one sensor physically sensing the environment of the host vehicle, predicting future movement behavior of at least one sensed vehicle and determining whether a gap on a neighboring lane of the host vehicle exists. If the neighboring lane of the host vehicle would fit better for the predicted future movement behavior, a recommendation information signal regarding feasibility of a lane change of the host vehicle to this better fitting lane is generated, the feasibility being determined by computationally combining the determination result of the existence of a gap and the predicted future movement behavior. A notification for the host vehicle's driver is output and/or, in case that a lane change is feasible, signals for performing an autonomous lane change on the basis of the recommendation information signal by the host vehicle are output.