Predictive Load Balancer Resource Scaling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Load balancers in remote computing services face challenges in efficiently managing fluctuating traffic, leading to potential service impairment due to insufficient or excessive resource allocation, which can result in dropped or impaired customer traffic.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a predictive modeling system that tracks historical data and real-time traffic patterns to automatically scale load balancer resources by allocating or deallocating computing resources based on anticipated traffic spikes, using a matching table to determine the required load balancer-to-backend capacity ratio and adjusting resources proactively.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If load balancer resources are increased to handle traffic spikes, then service reliability is improved, but resource utilization efficiency deteriorates due to excessive resource allocation during low traffic periods

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveservice reliabilityVSAvoidresource utilization efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The load balancer system dynamically adjusts resource allocation based on real-time traffic conditions and predictive analytics. Resources are not fixed but adapt continuously to match actual demand, allowing the system to maintain high reliability during traffic spikes while optimizing resource utilization during low-demand periods through automated scaling operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary actions by predicting future traffic patterns using historical data and machine learning models. Resource allocation decisions are made in advance based on predicted traffic spikes, allowing the system to prepare adequate capacity before demand increases, thereby maintaining service reliability without requiring excessive standby resources.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Loss of energy

If load balancer resources are decreased to optimize resource utilization, then resource efficiency is improved, but service reliability deteriorates due to insufficient capacity during traffic spikes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresource efficiencyVSAvoidservice reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements continuous feedback loops that monitor actual traffic patterns, resource utilization metrics, and service performance. This feedback informs dynamic resource allocation decisions, allowing the system to efficiently scale resources up or down based on real conditions while maintaining service reliability through predictive adjustments and automated responses to changing demand.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes key operational parameters such as resource allocation levels, scaling thresholds, and predictive model weights based on observed traffic patterns and performance metrics. These parameter adjustments enable the system to optimize resource efficiency while maintaining adequate capacity for handling traffic variations and ensuring service reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If manual resource allocation is used, then resource control precision is improved, but system complexity and operational overhead increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresource control precisionVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The load balancer system performs self-service through automated resource allocation based on predictive analytics and real-time monitoring. The system independently analyzes traffic patterns, predicts future demand, and adjusts resource allocation without manual intervention, thereby maintaining precise resource control while reducing operational complexity and overhead.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces manual mechanical resource allocation processes with automated computational systems using machine learning models and predictive algorithms. This substitution maintains or improves resource control precision through data-driven decisions while eliminating the complexity and errors associated with manual configuration and management.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Measurement precision

If predictive modeling is implemented, then resource allocation accuracy is improved, but system complexity increases due to additional modeling components

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresource allocation accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The predictive modeling components are integrated into the existing load balancer architecture, allowing the same system to perform both traditional load balancing functions and predictive resource allocation. This multi-functionality approach improves resource allocation accuracy without requiring completely separate systems, thereby limiting the increase in overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system merges predictive analytics capabilities with traditional load balancing operations into a unified resource management platform. By combining these functions, the system achieves improved resource allocation accuracy while reducing the complexity that would result from maintaining separate predictive modeling and load balancing systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS10409649B1Predictive load balancer resource management
Publication Date: 2019.09.10 AMAZON TECH INC
  • US10409649B1 patent drawing
  • US10409649B1 patent drawing
  • US10409649B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Computing resource service providers allow customers to execute computer systems on hardware provided by the computing resource service provider. The hardware may be distributed between various geographic locations connected by a network. A load balancer may be provided to distribute traffic between the computer systems. Furthermore, computing resource service provider may cause computing resources to be allocated or deallocated to the load balancer based at least in part on various attributes of the computer systems the load balancer is responsible for distributing traffic to. The various attributes may include a capacity of the computer systems.