Predictive Maintenance System Using Degradation Modeling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current maintenance strategies, such as corrective, preventive, and predictive maintenance, face limitations in effectively managing equipment availability and cost, as they either wait for failures to occur or perform unnecessary maintenance, leading to increased expenses and unexpected failures.

Innovation Solution

A data-driven predictive maintenance system that uses performance degradation modeling and monitoring, deriving ideal density functions from historical sensor data to detect pre-failure conditions and provide maintenance alerts, optimizing maintenance planning and reducing unnecessary actions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If preventive maintenance is performed regularly, then equipment reliability is improved, but maintenance cost increases due to unnecessary maintenance actions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveequipment reliabilityVSAvoidmaintenance cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes the parameter of maintenance timing from fixed periodic intervals to condition-based thresholds. By continuously monitoring equipment parameters (vibration, temperature, pressure, etc.) and comparing them against dynamically determined thresholds, maintenance is triggered only when actual degradation reaches critical levels, eliminating unnecessary preventive maintenance while ensuring reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements continuous feedback loops where sensor data from equipment is constantly monitored, analyzed, and used to adjust maintenance decisions in real-time. The feedback mechanism compares actual equipment condition against predicted degradation models, enabling dynamic adjustment of maintenance timing to optimize both reliability and cost by performing maintenance only when truly needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Loss of energy

If corrective maintenance is performed after failure, then maintenance cost decreases, but equipment availability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemaintenance costVSAvoidequipment availability
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by detecting early signs of degradation and predicting future failures before they occur. By analyzing trends in sensor data and comparing them against degradation models, the system identifies pre-failure conditions and schedules maintenance in advance, preventing catastrophic failures and ensuring equipment availability while avoiding the high costs of emergency repairs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables skipping the failure state by detecting degradation trends and intervening before complete failure occurs. By rushing through the early degradation phase with proactive maintenance actions, the system prevents the equipment from reaching the failure state, thereby maintaining availability and avoiding the higher costs associated with corrective maintenance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #21Skipping (Rushing through)

3Productivity

If predictive maintenance with continuous monitoring is implemented, then equipment availability is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveequipment availabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system introduces an intermediary layer consisting of sensors, data acquisition devices, and analysis software that mediates between the equipment and the maintenance decision-making process. These intermediaries continuously monitor equipment parameters and translate raw sensor data into actionable maintenance recommendations, enabling predictive maintenance without requiring complex direct intervention in the equipment itself.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces complex mechanical monitoring and diagnostic procedures with electronic sensing and computational analysis. Instead of using complex mechanical devices to detect equipment degradation, the system uses electronic sensors and software-based degradation models to monitor and predict failures, simplifying the overall system while maintaining high equipment availability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS10402511B2System for maintenance recommendation based on performance degradation modeling and monitoring
Publication Date: 2019.09.03 HITACHI LTD
  • US10402511B2 patent drawing
  • US10402511B2 patent drawing
  • US10402511B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Example implementations described herein are directed to predictive maintenance of equipment using data-driven performance degradation modelling and monitoring. Example implementations described herein detect degradation in performance over a period of time, and alert the user when degradation occurs. Through the example implementations, the operator of equipment undergoing predictive maintenance modeling can determine a more optimized time in repairing or replacing the equipment or its components.