Predictive Model Tuning for Time-Series Accuracy and Control Margin

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing predictive models face challenges in optimizing settings such as prediction horizon, explanatory variable selection, and range, requiring trial and error to balance performance and accuracy, which decreases as predictions extend further into the future.

Innovation Solution

An information processing apparatus and method that assists in generating predictive models by calculating prediction accuracy based on selected explanatory variables and positions, allowing for optimization of prediction points and variables through a user-friendly interface and simulation tools.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If the prediction point is set further into the future to increase control system performance, then the performance is improved, but the prediction accuracy decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol system performanceVSAvoidprediction accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system calculates prediction accuracy using actual values at selected positions and provides feedback to guide the selection of prediction points and explanatory variables. This feedback mechanism allows optimization of both performance and accuracy by iteratively adjusting settings based on calculated accuracy metrics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables changing parameters such as prediction point timing, explanatory variable selection, and explanatory variable section range. By adjusting these parameters and evaluating prediction accuracy at each configuration, the system optimizes the balance between future performance and prediction accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If trial and error is performed to optimize predictive model settings, then the model performance is improved, but the time and complexity of model generation increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel performanceVSAvoidmodel generation time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically calculates prediction accuracy and provides guidance for optimization, reducing the need for extensive manual trial and error. The automated accuracy calculation and visual output features enable faster model generation by guiding users toward optimal settings more efficiently.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces manual trial-and-error adjustment with automated calculation of prediction accuracy. By using computational methods to evaluate and compare different model configurations, the system reduces the time required for model generation while maintaining or improving performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Measurement precision

If more explanatory variables and positions are selected for the predictive model, then the prediction accuracy is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprediction accuracyVSAvoidmodel complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system calculates and provides feedback on prediction accuracy for different combinations of explanatory variables and positions. This feedback enables users to identify the minimum necessary complexity required to achieve satisfactory accuracy, avoiding unnecessary model complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system allows selective assignment of explanatory variables to specific positions in the explanatory variable section. By enabling local optimization of variable selection at different positions, the system achieves high prediction accuracy with reduced overall model complexity compared to using all variables throughout.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS20240281674A1Information processing apparatus, information processing method and non-transitory storage medium storing information processing program thereon
Publication Date: 2024.08.22 OMRON CORP
  • US20240281674A1 patent drawing
  • US20240281674A1 patent drawing
  • US20240281674A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Provided is an information processing apparatus for generating a predictive model. The predictive model is configured to calculate, at a prediction start point, a value at a prediction point in the future by a predetermined time margin from the prediction start point. The information processing apparatus includes a reception unit configured to receive a setting of the prediction point, a setting of an explanatory variable section corresponding to a range including the prediction start point and a period before the prediction start point, and selection of one or more positions from among a plurality of position candidates in the explanatory variable section, and a calculation unit configured to calculate prediction accuracy of the value at the prediction point using one or more actual values at the selected one or more positions based on time series data of the actual value corresponding to the value calculated by the predictive model.