Predictive Model for Substance Impact on Behavioral Patterns

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Individuals may not be aware of the specific side effects of medications on their cognitive abilities, as standard warnings are not personalized and they may underestimate the impacts of substances on their own impairment, leading to unsafe behaviors.

Innovation Solution

A method and computer program product that continuously monitor an individual's physical activities and behavioral patterns using sensors, analyze data to establish baseline patterns, and predict the impacts of substance consumption on these patterns, generating a predictive model to alert the individual and relevant personnel of expected deviations and their timing.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of information

If standard medication warnings are provided to individuals, then information about potential side effects is communicated, but the warnings are not personalized and individuals cannot accurately assess their own impairment levels

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepersonalized side effect informationVSAvoidindividual impairment assessment accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system continuously monitors individual behavioral data and provides real-time feedback about actual impairment levels. Sensors track gait, reaction time, and other behavioral metrics, comparing them against baseline data to generate personalized feedback about substance impact, enabling individuals to accurately assess their own impairment rather than relying on generic warnings

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables individuals to self-monitor their own impairment levels through automated sensor-based assessment. The individual serves their own monitoring needs by providing behavioral data that the system analyzes to generate personalized impairment assessments, eliminating the need for external evaluation while improving assessment accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Measurement precision

If continuous behavioral monitoring is implemented to detect substance impacts, then personalized side effect detection is achieved, but system complexity and data processing requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveside effect detection accuracyVSAvoidmonitoring system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The monitoring system is divided into separate functional modules: sensor data collection, baseline pattern recognition, deviation detection, and alert generation. Each module handles specific aspects of the monitoring process independently, reducing overall system complexity while maintaining high detection accuracy through specialized processing at each stage

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

A computational model serves as an intermediary between raw sensor data and interpretation of substance impact. The model translates complex behavioral data into meaningful assessments of impairment, acting as a mediator that simplifies the relationship between diverse sensor inputs and the final detection output, reducing system complexity while preserving accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Adaptability or versatility

If baseline behavioral patterns are established through continuous data collection, then personalized predictions can be generated, but time and computational resources are consumed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepersonalization capabilityVSAvoidbaseline establishment time
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by continuously collecting and analyzing behavioral data to establish baseline patterns in advance of substance consumption events. This preliminary baseline establishment enables rapid, personalized prediction of substance impacts when they occur, trading initial time investment for future processing efficiency and personalized adaptability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system maintains continuous data collection and baseline refinement operations rather than performing discrete batch processing. This continuous useful action allows the baseline to evolve and improve over time, enhancing personalization capability while distributing computational workload evenly, reducing peak resource demands

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Data Source

PatentUS11615876B2Predictive model for substance monitoring and impact prediction
Publication Date: 2023.03.28 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION
  • US11615876B2 patent drawing
  • US11615876B2 patent drawing
  • US11615876B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method, computer program product, and a system where a processor(s) obtains data related to physical activities performed by an individual from a sensor(s) proximate to the individual. The processor(s) cognitively analyzes the data to identify baseline behavioral patterns of the individual, when the individual is engaged in each of the physical activities. The processor(s) obtains data indicating consumption of a substance by the individual at a first time. The processor(s) determines impacts of the consumption on the baseline behavioral patterns of the individual and generates a data structure (a predictive model) that includes expected deviations from the baseline behavioral patterns of the individual, when the individual has consumed the substance.