Predictive Modeling for Unintended Order Fulfillment Outcomes

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current predictive modeling in order fulfillment lacks the ability to effectively identify and mitigate unintended fulfillment outcomes such as late payments, order disputes, and cancellations, which can lead to inefficiencies and financial losses for sellers.

Innovation Solution

A method that accesses order history to generate predictive models using statistical techniques like logistic regression and support vector machines, estimating the likelihood of unintended fulfillment outcomes and suggesting remedial actions to adjust orders and prevent these issues, such as splitting orders or notifying purchasers.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If predictive models are applied to identify unintended fulfillment outcomes, then the ability to detect and mitigate risks improves, but the complexity of the system increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to identify unintended fulfillment outcomesVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the order fulfillment process into distinct phases (order placement, billing, collection) and applies separate predictive models to each phase. This allows the complex predictive modeling task to be divided into manageable components, each handling specific unintended outcomes relevant to its phase while maintaining overall system reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary predictive modeling layer between the order management system and fulfillment operations. This intermediary system processes order data, applies statistical models, and generates risk assessments without disrupting the core fulfillment operations, thereby improving detection capability while isolating system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If multiple predictive models are used to estimate likelihood of unintended outcomes, then the precision of risk assessment improves, but the computational resources required increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprecision of risk assessmentVSAvoidcomputational resources
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies different predictive models with varying complexity to different order types and risk categories. High-value or high-risk orders receive more sophisticated multi-factor modeling, while standard orders use simpler models. This local differentiation maintains measurement precision for critical cases while reducing overall computational resource consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent dynamically adjusts model parameters and thresholds based on historical data and current order characteristics. By changing parameters such as probability thresholds and model sensitivity settings, the system optimizes the balance between assessment precision and computational efficiency for different operational contexts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If remedial actions are implemented to adjust orders, then the likelihood of unintended fulfillment outcomes decreases, but the processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelikelihood of avoiding unintended outcomesVSAvoidorder processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements remedial actions at the order placement stage before fulfillment processes begin. By proactively adjusting order terms, selecting appropriate fulfillment methods, or flagging orders for review during initial processing, the system prevents unintended outcomes before they occur, minimizing the time impact compared to reactive interventions later in the fulfillment cycle.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent enables automated remedial actions that adjust orders without requiring manual intervention. The system automatically applies pre-defined remediation rules, such as adjusting payment terms or selecting alternative fulfillment methods, based on predictive model outputs. This automation reduces processing time while maintaining the reliability benefits of remedial actions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS10296963B2Predictive modeling for unintended outcomes
Publication Date: 2019.05.21 ACCENTURE GLOBAL SERVICES LTD
  • US10296963B2 patent drawing
  • US10296963B2 patent drawing
  • US10296963B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods, systems, and apparatus, including computer programs encoded on a computer storage medium, for predictive modeling for unintended outcomes are disclosed. In one aspect, a method includes the actions of accessing an order history that, for each of one or more past orders, indicates (i) one or more order details associated with the order, and (ii) a fulfillment outcome associated with the order. The actions further include selecting one or more particular past orders that are associated with the particular unintended order fulfillment outcome. The actions further include generating a predictive model. The actions further include receiving one or more order details associated with a subsequently received order. The actions further include providing the one or more order details as input to the predictive model. The actions further include, identifying a remedial action. The actions further include providing data indicating the remedial action.