Predictive Order Preparation System for Delivery Logistics

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current on-demand service platforms face challenges in efficiently arranging transport services for delivery orders, particularly in predicting order preparation times and optimizing service provider allocation to minimize wait times and maximize order fulfillment, given fluctuations in demand and provider availability.

Innovation Solution

A network computing system that estimates provisioning levels based on order requests and available service providers, predicts order preparation times, and strategically selects service providers to ensure timely arrivals, using a combination of predictive models and optimization logic to adjust service parameters such as service range and value to optimize delivery operations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If the system increases service provider allocation to handle more order requests, then the number of fulfilled orders increases, but the wait time for service providers increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of fulfilled ordersVSAvoidservice provider wait time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by predicting order preparation times before orders are placed and proactively allocating service providers in advance. The provisioning subsystem forecasts future provisioning levels and pre-arranges service provider assignments, allowing providers to be ready before orders are actually fulfilled, thus reducing wait time while maintaining high fulfillment rates

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts service provider allocation based on real-time and forecasted demand conditions. The provisioning subsystem continuously monitors provisioning levels and modifies allocation strategies adaptively, transitioning between different allocation modes (e.g., from minimizing provider wait time to maximizing order fulfillment) based on current system state and predicted future conditions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If the system optimizes for timely order fulfillment, then customer satisfaction improves, but service provider wait time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveorder fulfillment timelinessVSAvoidservice provider wait time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system predicts order preparation times in advance and uses these predictions to timing service provider arrivals. By performing preliminary forecasting of when orders will be ready, the system can coordinate provider arrival to coincide with order completion, ensuring timely fulfillment while minimizing provider wait time through precise timing rather than early arrival

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes key parameters such as service range and value parameters dynamically based on provisioning levels. By adjusting these parameters, the system optimizes the balance between fulfillment timeliness and provider wait time, allowing flexible adaptation to different operational conditions and demand scenarios

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Adaptability or versatility

If the system increases service range to access more service providers, then provider availability increases, but the complexity of allocation increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveservice provider availabilityVSAvoidallocation system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the service provider allocation problem into manageable components: a provisioning subsystem that handles high-level forecasting and allocation strategy, and lower-level components that execute specific matching and routing. This segmentation allows the system to manage large service ranges by breaking down the complex allocation task into hierarchical layers, reducing overall system complexity while maintaining broad provider access

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS11436554B2Network computer system to implement predictive time-based determinations for fulfilling delivery orders
Publication Date: 2022.09.06 UBER TECHNOLOGIES INC
  • US11436554B2 patent drawing
  • US11436554B2 patent drawing
  • US11436554B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A network computer system selects a service provider for individual order requests by predicting an order preparation time of the respective supplier for the order request. During a time interval that precedes the order preparation time, the computer system matches an arrival time of a service provider to the respective supplier of an order request. The network computer system estimates an order delivery time for the requester based at least in part on the predicted order preparation time and on a location of the supplier relative to a location of the requester.