Predictive Platoon Model for Adaptive Cruise Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Adaptive cruise control systems face challenges in maintaining a smooth driving experience and reducing fuel consumption in dense traffic due to frequent velocity changes in preceding vehicles, as they react only after the preceding vehicle slows down, leading to discomfort and inefficient fuel use.

Innovation Solution

A predictive model for the future position and velocity of a preceding vehicle is developed using data from vehicles ahead, allowing the host vehicle to anticipate and adjust its speed proactively, using a dynamic platoon model and parameter estimation to optimize control inputs, such as coasting or braking, based on the Intelligent Driver Model and Kalman filter algorithms.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If adaptive cruise control reacts only after the preceding vehicle slows down, then the system maintains simplicity in control logic, but the driving experience becomes uncomfortable and fuel consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol logic simplicityVSAvoidfuel consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary action by predicting the preceding vehicle's future state and applying control inputs in advance. The predictive model estimates future position and velocity of the preceding vehicle, allowing the host vehicle to begin coasting or braking before the preceding vehicle actually slows down, thereby smoothing velocity changes and reducing fuel consumption while maintaining simple control logic

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Ease of operation

If adaptive cruise control reacts only after the preceding vehicle slows down, then the control system remains simple, but ride comfort deteriorates due to abrupt velocity changes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol system simplicityVSAvoidvelocity fluctuations
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies preliminary action by using the predictive model to anticipate the preceding vehicle's velocity changes and initiating smoothing control actions in advance. This allows the host vehicle to gradually adjust its velocity rather than reacting abruptly, thereby reducing velocity fluctuations and improving ride comfort while keeping the control system architecture simple

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Loss of energy

If predictive modeling with multiple vehicles is implemented, then fuel consumption is reduced and traffic flow is smoothed, but the computational complexity and data processing requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefuel consumptionVSAvoidmodel complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts only the essential dynamic characteristics needed for prediction from the platoon of vehicles. Rather than modeling every vehicle in detail, the predictive model focuses on extracting key state information (position, velocity, acceleration) from relevant vehicles ahead and using this extracted data to predict the preceding vehicle's future state, thereby reducing model complexity while maintaining fuel efficiency benefits

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The predictive model acts as an intermediary that processes data from multiple vehicles and transforms it into predicted future state information. This intermediary layer simplifies the complexity by aggregating and processing raw data from multiple sources into a single predictive output that can be directly used for control decisions, reducing the burden on the control system

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Measurement precision

If data from all vehicles ahead is collected, then prediction accuracy is improved, but communication bandwidth requirements and data processing load increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprediction accuracyVSAvoiddata volume
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts only the necessary data elements (position, velocity, acceleration) from vehicles ahead that are most relevant for predicting the preceding vehicle's state. By selecting and extracting only these key parameters rather than processing all available vehicle data, the system maintains high prediction accuracy while significantly reducing the quantity of data that needs to be transmitted and processed

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentUS8948995B2Preceding vehicle state prediction
Publication Date: 2015.02.03 TOYOTA JIDOSHA KK
  • US8948995B2 patent drawing
  • US8948995B2 patent drawing
  • US8948995B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A platoon model allows improved prediction of preceding vehicle future state. In this context, the preceding vehicle is a vehicle immediately ahead of the host vehicle, and the dynamic state of the preceding vehicle was predicted based on data received from one or more vehicles in the platoon. The intelligent driver model (IDM) was extended to model car-following dynamics within a platoon. A parameter estimation approach may be used to estimate the model parameters, for example to adapt to different driver types. An integrated approach including both state prediction and parameter estimation was highly effective.