Predictive Possession Model for Insurance Inventory Automation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Policyholders face challenges in creating and maintaining accurate inventories of personal possessions for insurance claims, especially after loss events, leading to difficulties in verifying ownership and value, which affects insurance premiums and claim processing.

Innovation Solution

A computer-based system generates and updates a list of personal possessions using a predictive possession model based on historical policyholder records, allowing users to confirm and adjust the inventory with minimal input, and prompts for documentation only when values exceed predetermined ranges.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If policyholders manually create and maintain inventory lists of personal possessions, then the inventory may be complete and accurate, but the process requires significant time and effort especially after loss events

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinventory accuracyVSAvoidtime to create and update inventory
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by automatically generating inventory lists using machine learning models trained on historical data before claims are filed. This pre-computation reduces the time burden on policyholders during actual claims events while maintaining accuracy through pre-validated data patterns.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables self-service by allowing policyholders to review, confirm, or adjust their automatically generated inventory lists with minimal input. The ML model continuously learns from user corrections, making the system progressively more accurate without requiring manual maintenance of detailed inventory records.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If policyholders provide detailed documentation for all claimed possessions, then insurance claims can be verified accurately, but the burden of gathering and submitting documentation increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclaim verification accuracyVSAvoidease of submitting claims
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts only the essential verification elements needed for claim validation by using ML to identify and focus on high-value or high-risk items that require documentation. Routine items are verified automatically through pattern recognition, reducing the documentation burden while maintaining reliability for significant claims.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts documentation requirements based on multiple parameters including item value thresholds, claim history patterns, and risk assessments. This adaptive approach verifies high-value items rigorously while streamlining the process for lower-value items, balancing reliability with ease of operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If insurance providers require comprehensive inventory lists and documentation for all possessions, then accurate coverage determination is achieved, but the complexity of the insurance process increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoverage determination accuracyVSAvoidinsurance process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the inventory verification process by categorizing items into different risk and value tiers. High-value items receive detailed scrutiny with multiple verification steps, while standard items are processed through streamlined automated workflows. This segmentation maintains coverage accuracy while reducing overall process complexity through differentiated handling.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The machine learning inventory system acts as an intermediary between policyholders and insurers, automatically generating and validating inventory lists using trained models. This intermediary layer handles the complexity of verification internally, presenting simplified interfaces to both users and insurers while maintaining precise coverage determination through backend analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Measurement precision

If policyholders update their inventory lists frequently to reflect current possessions, then the inventory remains current and accurate, but the maintenance effort and time required increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinventory currencyVSAvoidinventory maintenance efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system maintains continuous inventory accuracy through automated background processes that continuously learn from new data, user corrections, and emerging patterns. This continuous learning ensures the inventory remains current without requiring periodic manual updates, as the system adapts continuously to reflect changing possession patterns.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback loops where user confirmations, corrections, and claim outcomes continuously refine the ML models. This feedback mechanism automatically updates the inventory generation logic to reflect current possessions and user preferences, maintaining inventory currency while eliminating manual maintenance efforts through self-improving algorithms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20240127356A1Systems and methods for generating and updating an inventory of personal possessions of a user for insurance purposes
Publication Date: 2024.04.18 QUANATA LLC
  • US20240127356A1 patent drawing
  • US20240127356A1 patent drawing
  • US20240127356A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A computer-implemented method can include receiving personal data associated with a user. The method also can include predicting, by a trained predictive possession model, a set of items owned by the user based at least in part upon the personal data associated with the user. The trained predictive possession model is configured to extract data associated with the set of items from the personal data. The method additionally can include assigning, by the trained predictive possession model, a predicted value for each item of the set of items. The method further can include causing information indicative of an item of the set of items and the predicted value for the item to be displayed on a user device of the user. The method additionally can include receiving an adjusted value for the item in the set of items. The method further can include causing the trained predictive possession model to be updated based on the adjusted value for the item. Other embodiments are described.