Predictive Pressure Control for Additive Manufacturing Extruders

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Extrusion-based additive manufacturing systems face challenges in accurately monitoring and controlling pressure within the print head, leading to loss of extrudate failures due to material starvation and plugged nozzles, which result in defective parts and require inefficient fixed pressure threshold comparisons.

Innovation Solution

A predictive model is developed to estimate nozzle pressure based on sequences of extruder actuator speeds, allowing for dynamic adjustment of pressure thresholds and real-time control of material flow, enabling accurate extrusion during variable print head movements.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If fixed pressure threshold comparisons are used to monitor extrusion pressure, then the system structure remains simple, but false alerts occur frequently due to material starvation and plugged nozzles

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of material depositionVSAvoidcomplexity of pressure monitoring system
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic pressure thresholds that adapt based on extruder speed and operational conditions rather than using fixed thresholds. The system continuously adjusts the expected pressure range according to the extruder's current state, allowing the monitoring system to distinguish between normal pressure variations during acceleration/deceleration and actual anomalies like material starvation or plugged nozzles.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs feedback mechanisms where actual pressure sensor readings are compared against dynamically calculated expected pressure values. The difference between actual and expected pressure serves as a feedback signal to detect anomalies, enabling the system to self-adjust and maintain reliable operation without increasing structural complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Measurement precision

If dynamic pressure threshold adjustment is implemented based on extruder speed, then false alerts are reduced and detection accuracy improves, but the computational model and processing requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepressure monitoring accuracyVSAvoidcomplexity of predictive model
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes the parameter basis for threshold determination from fixed values to dynamically calculated values based on extruder speed and operational parameters. By modeling the relationship between extruder speed and expected pressure, the system adapts thresholds in real-time to match actual operating conditions, significantly improving detection precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements preliminary action by pre-establishing the mathematical model that relates extruder speed to expected pressure before actual printing begins. This model is constructed during system initialization or calibration phases, allowing the system to quickly compute dynamic thresholds during operation without complex real-time calculations, thus balancing precision with computational efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If real-time pressure monitoring with dynamic thresholds is used, then loss of extrudate failures are detected more accurately, but the system requires more complex modeling and data processing

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection of loss of extrudateVSAvoidtime for pressure analysis
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary action by pre-computing the mathematical model parameters during system initialization or calibration phases. This allows the runtime detection process to use pre-established relationships between extruder speed and expected pressure, significantly reducing the computational time required for real-time anomaly detection while maintaining high accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces complex real-time mechanical or computational analysis with a simplified mathematical model that uses pre-established relationships. By substituting complex real-time modeling with a streamlined calculation based on extruder speed and pre-computed parameters, the system achieves fast detection without requiring extensive processing time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS11390033B2Predictive flow control responses in an additive manufacturing system
Publication Date: 2022.07.19 STRATASYS INC
  • US11390033B2 patent drawing
  • US11390033B2 patent drawing
  • US11390033B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An additive manufacturing system includes an extruder having a motor and a pressure sensor. A filter receives speed values for the motor and generates a predicted pressure value from the speed values. A response threshold module sets a response threshold pressure value based on the predicted pressure value such that when the response threshold pressure value is between a pressure value from the pressure sensor and the predicted pressure value, a response is executed.