Predictive Pricing Model Using Local Economic Signals

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Retail companies rely on historical sales data for pricing decisions, failing to account for dynamic events that can significantly impact consumer purchasing power in specific geographic areas, leading to outdated pricing strategies.

Innovation Solution

A predictive pricing model that utilizes employment and demographic data to dynamically adjust prices in real-time based on recent events, incorporating machine learning to analyze payroll and demographic trends for tailored pricing strategies.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Stability of the object's composition

If historical sales data is used for pricing decisions, then pricing strategy consistency is maintained, but responsiveness to current economic conditions deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepricing strategy consistencyVSAvoidresponsiveness to economic conditions
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by collecting and analyzing employment data, economic indicators, and market trends in advance of pricing decisions. This allows the pricing model to be pre-prepared with multiple scenarios and predictions, enabling rapid response when economic conditions change without disrupting operational consistency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements continuous feedback loops where pricing decisions are monitored against actual sales outcomes and economic condition changes. This feedback mechanism allows the model to learn from past performance and continuously refine pricing strategies, maintaining consistency while adapting to new economic realities through data-driven adjustments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Device complexity

If traditional pricing models are used, then system complexity is minimized, but measurement precision of market conditions deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem complexityVSAvoidpricing accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The pricing system is segmented into multiple independent but integrated components: data collection modules for employment and economic data, separate analysis modules for different data types, and a synthesis module that combines insights. This segmentation allows each component to remain relatively simple while the integrated system achieves high measurement precision through comprehensive data analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces intermediary processing layers between raw data and final pricing decisions. These intermediaries include data validation filters, normalization layers, and predictive analytics engines that translate complex economic data into actionable pricing insights, thereby improving measurement precision without requiring the entire system to become overly complex.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Speed

If real-time data processing is implemented, then responsiveness to market changes is improved, but computational resource requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepricing adjustment speedVSAvoidcomputational resource consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements periodic action by processing real-time data at strategically determined intervals rather than continuously. Critical economic indicators are updated at specific frequencies based on their volatility and impact on pricing, allowing the system to maintain responsiveness while avoiding unnecessary computational overhead from constant processing of stable data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies local quality by varying the level of processing intensity based on the specific data source and its current state. High-volatility data streams such as employment reports receive more frequent and intensive processing, while stable data like long-term economic trends are processed less frequently, optimizing computational resource allocation across different data dimensions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS12475477B2Systems and methods for predictive pricing
Publication Date: 2025.11.18 ADP INC
  • US12475477B2 patent drawing
  • US12475477B2 patent drawing
  • US12475477B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods are described for dynamic and predictive pricing for ecommerce systems and brick-and-mortar retail businesses for a selected geographic location or territory. In one example, a system comprises a computing device that is configured to receive a request to display a network page of an item on a client device. The computing device is further configured to determine a geographic location of the client device and determine a price for the item using a machine learning model based at least in part on the geographic location. The network page is displayed on the client device to include the price of the item.