Retail Energy Management With Predictive Rate Plan Switching

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The energy management systems for consumers lack efficient tools for monitoring and managing energy usage across deregulated, partially deregulated, and regulated markets, leading to inefficiencies and increased costs due to the absence of unbiased information and automated management solutions.

Innovation Solution

The development of a system that includes smart appliances and a resource management server, enabling real-time monitoring and control of energy usage, providing consumers with projected costs based on historical data and current utility rates, and allowing for optimized energy consumption planning through aggregation of smart meter data and integration with IoT devices.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If consumers manually monitor and manage energy usage without automated tools, then they have simple system requirements, but energy management efficiency deteriorates and costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy management efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables automated energy management where the smart appliance and resource management server perform monitoring, data aggregation, and cost calculation functions autonomously without requiring manual consumer intervention. The system self-manages energy usage tracking and provides projected costs automatically.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The resource management server acts as an intermediary between smart appliances, smart meters, and consumers. It aggregates data from multiple sources, processes information, and presents unified energy management insights to consumers, simplifying the complexity of direct appliance-to-consumer data flows.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Loss of information

If consumers use multiple energy providers and manual monitoring methods, then system complexity is low, but information completeness deteriorates and bias increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinformation completenessVSAvoidmonitoring system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system merges data from multiple energy providers, smart meters, and appliance sources into a unified energy management platform. The resource management server consolidates information from deregulated, partially deregulated, and regulated market sources, providing comprehensive and unbiased energy usage information.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Measurement precision

If real-time monitoring and data aggregation are implemented, then energy usage visibility is improved, but processing requirements and system complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy usage monitoring precisionVSAvoiddata processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary data aggregation and processing at the resource management server before presenting information to consumers. Historical data and current utility rates are pre-processed to generate projected costs, reducing the computational burden during real-time consumer interactions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS11429075B2System, apparatus and method for energy management, for usage by consumers of energy from electric utility service providers, and monitoring and management of same
Publication Date: 2022.08.30 ENERGYBILL COM LLC
  • US11429075B2 patent drawing
  • US11429075B2 patent drawing
  • US11429075B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The disclosure includes methods, systems and apparatus for predictive management of efficient selecting and receiving of retail electric utility service to a facility for a period, by automated selecting of a retail utility service provider corresponding to a selected least cost path of predicted rate plan choices across the period, wherein costs of all possible, viable time-bounded predicted rate plan choices are determined for predicted consumer usage where a predicted market of retail rate formulas for the period are predicted in relation to at least one variable, such as weather.