Predictive Self-Protection for Portable Electronics

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current mobile devices lack the ability to predict and proactively protect themselves from environmental hazards such as water immersion and high temperatures, often only responding after a dangerous condition has occurred, which can lead to device malfunction or damage.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a system that monitors multiple sensors on mobile devices to detect potential hazards, infers risks through context data, and triggers preemptive protection actions based on pre-defined policies and machine learning algorithms, even if the data is not directly related to the specific condition, such as using microphone data to infer water damage.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If current protection schemes are used that only activate after dangerous conditions occur, then the device structure remains simple, but the device reliability deteriorates because protection is not provided proactively

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice reliabilityVSAvoidprotection system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by continuously monitoring sensor data and context information to predict hazardous conditions before they occur. The machine learning model analyzes patterns in sensor readings (accelerometer, gyroscope, microphone, temperature, humidity) to anticipate events like water immersion, drops, or extreme temperatures, and triggers protective measures in advance, thereby improving reliability without requiring complex reactive protection mechanisms

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The device serves itself by using its existing sensors and processing capabilities to monitor its own condition and environment. The system leverages already-present hardware (accelerometer, gyroscope, microphone, temperature sensor, humidity sensor) and uses machine learning algorithms to autonomously detect risk patterns and initiate protective actions without external intervention, maintaining simplicity while enhancing reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If multiple sensors and context data are monitored to predict hazards, then the predictive protection capability is improved, but the computational complexity and energy consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepredictive protection capabilityVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies partial action by selectively processing sensor data based on predicted risk levels. Instead of continuously analyzing all sensor inputs at full computational intensity, the machine learning model processes data at varying levels of depth depending on the detected situation, performing more intensive analysis only when hazard patterns are emerging, thus balancing predictive capability with energy consumption

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system achieves multi-functionality by using a single machine learning model to analyze multiple sensor types (accelerometer, gyroscope, microphone, temperature, humidity) for various hazard predictions (water immersion, drops, extreme temperatures). This unified approach consolidates computational resources and reduces overall energy consumption compared to having separate dedicated systems for each sensor and hazard type

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Reliability

If sensor data is used to infer potential hazards before they occur, then the protection timing is improved, but the measurement precision requirements increase to accurately distinguish real hazards from normal conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprotection timingVSAvoidhazard detection precision
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses feedback mechanisms where the machine learning model continuously receives sensor data, compares it against learned patterns of hazardous conditions, and adjusts its predictions based on the results. The model learns from historical data and feedback loops to improve its ability to distinguish true hazards from normal variations in sensor readings, enhancing detection precision over time while maintaining early warning capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system merges data from multiple sensor sources (accelerometer, gyroscope, microphone, temperature, humidity) to infer hazardous conditions. By combining information from these diverse sensors, the system achieves more precise hazard detection than any single sensor could provide alone, as the multi-sensor fusion approach cross-validates readings and reduces false positives while maintaining early detection timing

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS10833718B2Automatic self-protection for a portable electronic device
Publication Date: 2020.11.10 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION
  • US10833718B2 patent drawing
  • US10833718B2 patent drawing
  • US10833718B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Provided are techniques for automatically protecting portable and wearable electronic devices from potential hazards by predicting when such hazards may occur. Techniques may include monitoring a plurality of sensors on the mobile computing device; receiving, on the mobile computing device, context data from a plurality of context-service applications; selecting a set of device-protection policies based upon an availability of the plurality of sensors and the plurality of context-service applications, wherein the set of device-protection policies are configured to determine a level of risk to the mobile computing device based on sensor data received from the plurality of sensors and the context data; applying, the sensor data and the context data to the set of device-protection policies to generate the level of risk; and triggering a self-protection action if the level of risk exceeds a pre-determined threshold level of risk.