Predictive Sensor System for Aircraft Engine Maintenance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current systems fail to accurately predict and identify specific aircraft engines that will be unexpectedly grounded for maintenance, leading to inefficiencies and increased costs due to inadequate analysis of sensor data and limited user-friendly presentation of prediction results.

Innovation Solution

A predictive sensor system with a network of sensors that track engine performance and a graphical user interface (GUI) to efficiently route aircraft for maintenance, using machine learning models to identify 'at-risk' engines and provide actionable alerts for preventative action.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional analytical models are used to predict maintenance events, then the system can process sensor data, but the analysis requires excessive time and memory resources

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprediction accuracyVSAvoidanalysis time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces conventional analytical models with machine learning models that are specifically optimized for processing sensor data from aircraft engines. The machine learning models are trained on historical sensor data to recognize patterns indicating maintenance events, enabling faster and more accurate predictions without requiring excessive computational resources.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transforms the approach by changing from traditional statistical analysis parameters to machine learning parameters such as neural network weights and decision tree structures. This parameter transformation allows the system to process sensor data more efficiently while maintaining or improving prediction accuracy for maintenance events.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If conventional analytical models are used to predict maintenance events, then the system can generate predictions, but the amount of memory required is excessive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprediction accuracyVSAvoidmemory resources
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent substitutes memory-intensive conventional analytical models with streamlined machine learning models that use optimized data structures and algorithms. The machine learning models process sensor data through trained parameters rather than requiring extensive storage of intermediate calculation results, significantly reducing memory requirements while maintaining prediction capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Loss of information

If the system presents detailed sensor data for thousands of sensors monitoring hundreds of engines, then complete information is provided, but the interface becomes tedious and not user-friendly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata completenessVSAvoiduser-friendliness
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts only the most relevant information from the vast sensor data set and presents it through the graphical user interface. Instead of displaying all sensor readings, the system identifies and highlights engines with predicted maintenance events and shows only the critical sensor data and maintenance recommendations, making the interface user-friendly while preserving essential information.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the overwhelming sensor data into manageable groups and categories within the GUI. The interface organizes information by engine, by maintenance priority, and by sensor type, allowing users to navigate and access detailed data systematically without being overwhelmed by the total volume of information.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Reliability

If previous systems predict the number of engines requiring unexpected grounding, then aggregate maintenance planning is possible, but specific engines cannot be identified for targeted maintenance

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprediction accuracyVSAvoidengine identification precision
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces aggregate prediction models with machine learning models that analyze sensor data at the individual engine level. The models process unique sensor patterns from each engine to identify specific engines likely to experience maintenance events, providing both accurate predictions and precise engine identification for targeted maintenance planning.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS12190253B1Method and system of predicting maintenance events using machine learning model(s) and a training data set
Publication Date: 2025.01.07 AMERICAN AIRLINES INC
  • US12190253B1 patent drawing
  • US12190253B1 patent drawing
  • US12190253B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A system according to which a network of physical sensors are configured to detect and track the performance of aircraft engines. The physical sensors are placed in specific locations to detect an exhaust gas temperature, vibration, speed, oil pressure, and fuel flow for each aircraft engine. The performance of each aircraft engine is then viewed in combination with oil consumption associated with that aircraft engine and the routine maintenance program associated with that aircraft engine to route the aircraft and move the aircraft, in accordance with the routing, to a specific location. The sensors efficiently track the performance and physical condition of the engines. Moreover, a listing of identified “at-risk” engines is displayed on a screen of a GUI in a manner that allows for easy navigation and display. Data point(s) that triggered the identification of each “at-risk” engine are easily accessible and viewable.