Predictive Soil Property Map for Agricultural Machine Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Agricultural ground engaging machines face challenges in maintaining optimal performance due to variations in soil properties such as moisture, temperature, and nutrient levels, leading to suboptimal seed placement and tillage quality, which existing control systems struggle to address effectively due to latency in sensor readings and machine responses.

Innovation Solution

The system generates predictive soil property maps using in-situ sensors and information maps to model relationships between soil characteristics and properties, allowing for proactive control of downforce, tool position, and seed delivery systems, thereby optimizing operations across varying field conditions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If real-time sensor readings are used to control ground engaging tools, then responsiveness to soil conditions is improved, but latency in sensor readings and machine responses causes suboptimal performance

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol system responsivenessVSAvoidsensor reading latency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by generating predictive maps of soil properties before the ground engaging tools actually encounter those conditions. In-situ sensors detect soil properties ahead of time, and predictive models forecast future soil conditions along the machine's path, allowing the control system to prepare appropriate tool settings in advance rather than reacting with delayed real-time adjustments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

Predictive models serve as intermediaries between raw sensor data and control actions. The models process sensor readings and generate predictive maps that bridge the time gap between detection and response, translating current sensor data into forecasts of future soil conditions that the control system can act upon immediately.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If ground engaging tools maintain fixed parameters during operation, then machine stability is improved, but variations in soil properties lead to suboptimal seed placement and tillage quality

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveseed placement qualityVSAvoidsoil condition adaptability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements dynamic control by continuously adjusting ground engaging tool parameters based on real-time and predictive soil condition data. Instead of fixed settings, the control system varies tool depth, downforce, and position dynamically as the machine moves across the field, adapting to changing soil properties while maintaining operational stability through automated feedback control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The control system applies local quality by customizing tool parameters for specific geographic locations based on predictive soil maps. Each section of the field receives tailored tool settings appropriate to its predicted soil conditions, allowing optimal seed placement and tillage quality in each local area rather than using uniform settings across the entire field.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Measurement precision

If predictive models are generated using in-situ sensors and information maps, then soil property prediction accuracy is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesoil property prediction accuracyVSAvoidpredictive system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The predictive model generator serves multiple functions: it processes data from various in-situ sensors, integrates information from existing field maps, generates predictive soil property maps, and outputs control recommendations. This multi-functional approach consolidates what could be separate complex systems into a unified platform that handles data acquisition, processing, prediction, and control guidance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentEP4256931A1Agricultural ground engaging machine and method of controlling such
Publication Date: 2023.10.11 DEERE & CO
  • EP4256931A1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4256931A1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4256931A1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

An agricultural ground engaging machine (100) is disclosed. The agricultural ground engaging machine (100) comprising: a control system (314); a communication system (306) that receives an information map (358) that includes values of a characteristic corresponding to different geographic locations in a field; an in-situ sensor (308) that detects a value of a soil property corresponding to a geographic location in the field; a predictive model generator (310) that generates a predictive soil property model that models a relationship between characteristic values and values of the soil property based on the value of the soil property detected by the in-situ sensor (308) corresponding to the geographic location and a value of the characteristic in the information map (358) at the geographic location; and a predictive map generator (312) that generates a functional predictive soil property map of the worksite, that maps predictive values of the soil property to the different geographic locations in the worksite, based on the values of the characteristic in the information map (358) and based on the predictive soil property model. Furthermore, a method of controlling an agricultural ground engaging machine (100) is disclosed.