Predictive Spark Control for Hydrogen Engine Combustion Stability

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Natural Gas (NG) and Hydrogen (H2) Internal Combustion Engines (ICEs) face significant challenges due to large variations in Start of Combustion (SOC) and high propensity to combustion anomalies like backfire, knock, and preignition, which limit their power density and efficiency.

Innovation Solution

A predictive model-based spark control system that adjusts the spark waveform/power during the same spark event to minimize SOC variations. This system includes sensors to detect spark location and flow velocity, and a control module that uses lookup tables and combustion simulations to adjust the spark energy/power accordingly.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If high-energy/power spark ignition systems are used to ignite ultra-lean Hydrogen mixtures, then ignition reliability is improved, but Start of Combustion (SOC) variations increase causing combustion anomalies

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveignition reliabilityVSAvoidSOC variations
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The ignition system dynamically adjusts spark energy and power delivery in real-time based on detected spark location and flow velocity conditions. The control module modifies spark waveform characteristics during the same spark event to compensate for variations in spark location, thereby maintaining consistent SOC despite using high-energy ignition to ensure reliability in ultra-lean mixtures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates sensors to detect spark location and flow velocity, feeding this information back to the control module which then adjusts subsequent spark parameters. This closed-loop feedback mechanism enables real-time correction of SOC variations while maintaining the high ignition energy needed for reliable combustion of ultra-lean Hydrogen mixtures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Stability of the object's composition

If spark energy is increased to reduce SOC variations, then combustion stability is improved, but risk of electrode damage and hot spots increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecombustion stabilityVSAvoidelectrode damage and hot spots
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies different spark energy levels and waveform characteristics tailored to the specific local conditions detected at each spark location. Rather than using uniformly high energy, the control module adjusts spark parameters locally based on flow velocity and position, providing just enough energy for stable combustion while avoiding excessive energy that would cause electrode damage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes spark waveform parameters (energy, duration, shape) dynamically based on detected conditions. By adjusting these parameters in real-time, the system maintains combustion stability through adequate energy delivery while preventing electrode damage by avoiding consistently high energy levels when not necessary.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If advanced SOC is used to achieve fast combustion, then engine power density is improved, but knock and preignition occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveengine power densityVSAvoidknock and preignition
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The control module uses feedback from spark location and flow velocity detection to predict and control the resulting SOC timing. This enables the system to achieve advanced SOC for high power density while preventing knock and preignition by avoiding excessive advancement that would cause these harmful combustion events.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Stability of the object's composition

If retarded SOC is used to avoid knock, then combustion stability is improved, but backfire and misfire occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecombustion stabilityVSAvoidbackfire and misfire
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts spark timing and energy based on real-time detection of spark location and flow velocity. This enables the system to achieve retarded SOC when necessary to avoid knock while preventing backfire and misfire through adequate energy delivery and timing adjustment, maintaining combustion stability without harmful events.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system achieves improved engine performance by maintaining a consistent SOC, reducing combustion anomalies, and enabling operation at higher power densities and efficiencies, thus making H2-ICEs a competitive sustainable energy conversion solution.

Implementation Method 1

introducing a spark across at least one of the one or more electrodes gaps to ignite the fuel-air mixture

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrical discharge: Electric Spark

Data Source

PatentUS12228068B1Predictive model-based spark control
Publication Date: 2025.02.18 PROMETHEUS APPLIED TECHNOLOGIES LLC
  • US12228068B1 patent drawing
  • US12228068B1 patent drawing
  • US12228068B1 patent drawing

AI summary

In certain embodiments, remarkable improvements in H2-ICE performance may be achieved with the combination of Active Scavenge Prechamber technology and Predictive Model-Based Spark Control to overcome the drawbacks of known combustion technologies. Improvements may be achieved by generating the flow substantially orthogonal to an electrode gap to achieve a consistent laminar flow between the two or more electrode surfaces. In certain embodiments, direction of the flow substantially orthogonal to an electrode gap may be achieved by positioning a scavenging port upstream of the electrode gap at a predeterminate angle (α) in relation to the direction of the rotational flow and at a predeterminate distance (δ) from the electrode gap. In certain embodiments, predeterminate angle (α) and predeterminate distance (δ) may depend on the average velocity of the rotational flow and the average velocity of the radial flow throughout the range of engine speeds.