Predictive Speed Limit Advisor for Adaptive Driver Alerts

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional navigation systems for vehicles lack predictive capabilities to warn drivers of upcoming speed limit changes and special time-dependent conditions, relying on reactionary alerts and rigid models that do not account for local time variations or operator preferences.

Innovation Solution

A navigational system that uses a map database and a locator device to predictively communicate upcoming conditions to the driver, including speed limits and time-dependent variables, by correlating vehicle location with positional points and providing adaptive alerts based on deceleration rates and local time adjustments.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of information

If conventional navigation systems use reactionary alerting methods, then the system complexity is reduced, but the driver cannot be warned in advance of upcoming speed limit changes or time-dependent conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepredictive information about upcoming conditionsVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by calculating and storing advance warning distances and times for upcoming speed limit changes and time-dependent conditions. The processor determines the distance and time to future points of interest and triggers alerts before the vehicle reaches these points, enabling drivers to react proactively rather than reactively.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts alert timing and distance based on current vehicle speed, driver behavior patterns, and road conditions. The advance warning distance is not fixed but varies according to real-time parameters, allowing the system to optimize when alerts are triggered without requiring complex manual configuration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Adaptability or versatility

If the system provides rigid one-size-fits-all models, then the device complexity is reduced, but the system cannot adapt to individual driver preferences or local time variations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to driver preferences and local conditionsVSAvoidsystem configuration complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes parameters such as advance warning distance, alert timing, and speed threshold based on driver preferences and local conditions. The processor adjusts these parameters dynamically according to the driver's behavior patterns and the specific geographic location, enabling customization without requiring complex manual setup for each parameter.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs self-service by automatically learning and adapting to driver preferences over time. The processor analyzes driver behavior patterns and autonomously adjusts alert parameters without requiring explicit user configuration, reducing the complexity of system setup while maintaining high adaptability to individual preferences.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Loss of time

If the system calculates advance warning distances and times, then the predictive capability is improved, but the processing time and computational load increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedriver reaction timeVSAvoidcomputational energy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies partial action by calculating advance warning distances and times only for relevant upcoming conditions rather than continuously processing all possible data. The processor focuses computational resources on determining critical alert parameters for near-future points of interest, reducing overall computational load while maintaining adequate reaction time for safety-critical warnings.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS7739036B2Speed limit advisor
Publication Date: 2010.06.15 GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS LLC
  • US7739036B2 patent drawing
  • US7739036B2 patent drawing
  • US7739036B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A navigation system (10) adapted for use with a vehicle (12) having an operator (14) includes a map database (16) presenting a current vehicle path, a locator device (20) communicatively coupled to the database (16) and configured to determine the location of the vehicle (12) and to associate the location with a position point within the database (16). The system (10) further includes an improved indicator (34) configured to predictively communicate an upcoming condition to the operator (14), determine a time-dependent-variable condition, compare a current condition of the vehicle (12) to the upcoming condition, and alert the operator (14) to a non-compliant comparison. The system (10) is further configured to receive preferences from the operator (14) and vehicle (12), so as to present a modifiable mode of operation.