Predictive Traffic Alert Control for Blind Warehouse Intersections

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Commercial warehouses and high-risk traffic areas face collisions due to 'blind' intersections and corners, exacerbated by noise and visual obstructions, with existing warning systems providing insufficient advance warnings.

Innovation Solution

A predictive dynamic alert and control system using sensor nodes, transponders, and imagers to detect, predict, and manage traffic paths, providing advance warnings and controls to prevent collisions through visual, audible, or tactile alerts and operational adjustments.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If sensor nodes and transponders are deployed to detect and predict traffic paths, then collision prevention capability is improved, but system complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecollision prevention capabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system divides the hazardous environment into multiple detection zones using distributed sensor nodes. Each sensor node independently monitors its local area for traffic members, and the gateway computing device aggregates data from multiple nodes to create comprehensive collision predictions. This segmentation allows the system to achieve high reliability without requiring a single complex centralized system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary detection and prediction of traffic member paths using sensor nodes and machine learning algorithms before collisions occur. By continuously monitoring and predicting future positions of traffic members, the system provides advance warnings to operators, enabling them to take preventive action before hazardous situations develop into actual collisions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If advance warning time is increased to allow operators to react, then safety is improved, but the system requires more complex prediction and earlier detection capabilities

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoidprediction capability requirement
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The system continuously performs preliminary detection and prediction of traffic member trajectories using sensor data and machine learning models. By maintaining constant monitoring and updating predicted paths in real-time, the system can provide advance warnings with sufficient lead time for operator reaction while managing the complexity through incremental prediction updates rather than complex future-state simulations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The machine learning algorithms automatically learn and adapt to traffic member behaviors and patterns from historical data, enabling the system to improve its prediction accuracy over time without requiring manual programming of complex prediction rules. This self-learning capability reduces the difficulty of detecting and measuring future collision risks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Loss of time

If multiple alert signals are provided to traffic members, then response time is improved, but information overload and confusion may occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse timeVSAvoidinformation clarity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system provides alert signals with different characteristics (visual, audible, tactile) tailored to specific traffic members and their current situations. Each traffic member receives alerts appropriate to their type, location, and predicted risk level, rather than uniform alerts to all participants. This localized differentiation improves response time while maintaining information clarity by providing relevant, context-specific warnings.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system monitors traffic member responses to alerts and uses this feedback to adjust future alert signaling. By learning from operator responses and situational outcomes, the system optimizes alert delivery timing, type, and intensity to maximize response effectiveness while minimizing information overload and confusion in future alert scenarios.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20260024438A1Dynamic direction protocols and system among parties in traffic
Publication Date: 2026.01.22 REED AMANDA
  • US20260024438A1 patent drawing
  • US20260024438A1 patent drawing
  • US20260024438A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A predictive dynamic alert, control, and management system configured to detect traffic members through a plurality of sensor nodes and transponders in hazardous environments, learn and predict traffic paths and traffic habits of traffic members, and provide advance warning and advance action and control signals to prevent traffic accidents, is provided.