Predictive Transport Control for Semiconductor Traffic Congestion

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing transport control systems in semiconductor manufacturing plants are reactive and rely on predefined events to manage traffic congestion, lacking predictive capabilities to optimize transport operations and reduce congestion proactively.

Innovation Solution

A transport control device equipped with a machine-learned state predictor and determinator that uses past and predicted transport command data to optimize parameter settings, such as area-vehicle number settings and route selection algorithms, to anticipate and prevent traffic congestion and improve transport efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If reactive measures are taken after traffic congestion occurs, then traffic congestion can be addressed, but transport efficiency cannot be optimized proactively

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransport efficiencyVSAvoidtransport time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by predicting future traffic congestion states using machine learning models before congestion actually occurs. The state predictor analyzes current and historical transport system data to forecast future states, and the determinator pre-adjusts operational parameters to prevent congestion, rather than reacting after congestion occurs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback by continuously monitoring the actual transport system state and comparing it with predicted states. The machine learning models are trained using feedback from historical data where actual outcomes are compared with predictions, enabling the system to learn and improve its predictive accuracy over time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If predefined events are used to manage traffic congestion, then congestion can be detected, but the system lacks adaptive predictive capabilities

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecongestion detection accuracyVSAvoidpredictive capability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces traditional mechanical rule-based congestion detection with machine learning-based predictive modeling. Instead of relying on predefined thresholds and static rules, the system uses trained neural networks and regression models that can adaptively predict congestion based on complex patterns in transport system data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes parameters by dynamically adjusting operational parameters (such as vehicle dispatch intervals, route assignments, or speed limits) based on predicted congestion states. The determinator selects optimal parameter values from multiple candidates to prevent predicted congestion, making the system adaptive rather than static.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If traditional control methods are used, then system simplicity is maintained, but transport optimization is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransport amount per unit timeVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system introduces an intermediary layer consisting of machine learning models (state predictor and determinator) that bridge the gap between simple data collection and complex control decisions. These intermediary models process raw transport system data and generate optimized control parameters, enabling advanced optimization without requiring direct complex control logic throughout the entire system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS11599115B2Transport control device
Publication Date: 2023.03.07 MURATA MASCH LTD
  • US11599115B2 patent drawing
  • US11599115B2 patent drawing
  • US11599115B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A transport control device includes a state predictor that is machine-learned to output, for each candidate of a setting value of a parameter to control the operation of a transport system, state prediction information indicating a predicted state of the transport system associated with a second period after a first period, and a determinator that determines state prediction information associated with a prediction target period for each candidate of the setting value of the parameter, and determines the setting value of the parameter to be applied to the transport system in the prediction target period based on an evaluation result of the state prediction information for each candidate of the setting value of the parameter.