Predictive Yield Map for Harvester Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Agricultural harvesters face performance degradation when transitioning between areas of varying yields without appropriate adjustments in operating settings, leading to inefficiencies and reduced performance.

Innovation Solution

The development of a system that generates a predictive yield map by combining historical yield data with real-time sensor inputs, using models to anticipate crop yields and adjust harvester settings accordingly, enabling optimal operation across different yield areas.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If the harvester operates with fixed settings across the field, then the device complexity is reduced and ease of operation is improved, but the productivity decreases when transitioning between areas of varying yield

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveharvesting efficiencyVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by generating a predictive yield map before harvesting begins. This map combines historical yield data with current vegetative index data to predict where high and low yield areas will be located. The operator can review this map beforehand and pre-adjust harvester settings or plan transitions between control zones, avoiding reactive adjustments during harvesting and maintaining high productivity without requiring complex real-time control systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The field is segmented into different control zones based on the predictive yield map, dividing it into areas of expected high yield, medium yield, and low yield. Each zone can be assigned specific harvester settings and speed parameters. This segmentation allows the operator to manage complexity by working with discrete zones rather than continuous adjustments, improving productivity through systematic zone-by-zone harvesting while keeping the control system manageable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Productivity

If the operator manually adjusts settings during harvesting transitions, then the productivity is maintained, but the loss of time occurs during adjustment periods

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveharvesting efficiencyVSAvoidadjustment time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The predictive yield map is generated in advance before harvesting operations begin, allowing the operator to identify all transition points between yield zones beforehand. The operator can pre-configure appropriate settings for each zone and plan the harvesting sequence, eliminating the need for time-consuming manual adjustments during actual harvesting transitions and maintaining continuous productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables dynamic control by allowing the operator to pre-set multiple control zones with different parameters in the predictive yield map. During harvesting, the operator can quickly switch between pre-configured zones using simple zone selection rather than manually adjusting multiple individual settings, significantly reducing adjustment time while maintaining optimal productivity across varying yield conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Measurement precision

If real-time yield sensing is used to control harvesting, then the manufacturing precision of yield measurement is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveyield measurement accuracyVSAvoidsensor system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses an intermediary approach by combining simple, low-cost vegetative index sensors (such as optical sensors measuring plant density and health) with historical yield data from previous harvesting operations. This combination creates a predictive model that achieves high measurement precision for yield prediction without requiring complex real-time yield sensing hardware. The vegetative index serves as an intermediary indicator that correlates with expected yield, providing accurate predictions through simple, inexpensive sensors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentEP3981243B1Map generation and control system
Publication Date: 2024.07.17 DEERE & CO
  • EP3981243B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3981243B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3981243B1 patent drawingFigure 3A

AI summary

One or more information maps are obtained by an agricultural work machine. The one or more information maps map one or more agricultural characteristic values at different geographic locations of a field. An in-situ sensor on the agricultural work machine senses an agricultural characteristic as the agricultural work machine moves through the field. A predictive map generator generates a predictive map that predicts a predictive agricultural characteristic at different locations in the field based on a relationship between the values in the one or more information maps and the agricultural characteristic sensed by the in-situ sensor. The predictive map can be output and used in automated machine control.