Predictive Yield Mapping for Adaptive Harvester Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Agricultural harvesters face performance degradation when transitioning between areas of varying yield in a field due to inadequate adjustments in machine settings, leading to issues such as increased grain loss, plugging, or decreased efficiency.

Innovation Solution

The use of in-situ sensors and predictive mapping technology to generate a functional predictive yield map, which predicts crop yield based on relationships between vegetative index values and historical yield data, allowing for real-time adjustments in machine settings to optimize performance across different yield areas.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If the harvester operates with fixed settings across the field, then the machine structure and operation simplicity are maintained, but the performance degrades when transitioning between areas of varying yield

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveharvesting efficiencyVSAvoidadaptability to varying yield areas
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The harvester system dynamically adjusts operating settings (such as header height, reel speed, and rotor speed) based on real-time yield predictions from the information map, transforming the fixed-settings operation into an adaptive dynamic system that optimizes performance across varying yield areas

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses in-situ sensors to detect actual yield values and compares them with predicted values from the information map, creating a feedback loop that continuously refines the yield predictions and adjusts machine settings to maintain optimal performance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Adaptability or versatility

If the operator manually modifies control settings when transitioning between yield areas, then the adaptability to varying yield is improved, but the operation complexity and time loss increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to varying yield areasVSAvoidoperational simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The harvester system automatically adjusts its own operating settings based on the information map and sensor data, eliminating the need for operator intervention and enabling the machine to self-optimize performance across varying yield areas

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces manual operator control with an automated control system that uses electronic sensors, processors, and actuators to detect yield variations and adjust machine settings, substituting mechanical/manual operations with electronic automation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Quantity of substance

If the harvester transitions from reduced yield to increased yield areas, then the grain harvest quantity increases, but grain loss and plugging increase due to inadequate setting adjustments

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegrain harvest quantityVSAvoidgrain loss and plugging
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses the information map to predict yield variations in advance and proactively adjusts operating settings before the harvester enters high-yield areas, preventing grain loss and plugging by preparing the machine in advance for the upcoming yield conditions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS11653588B2Yield map generation and control system
Publication Date: 2023.05.23 DEERE & CO
  • US11653588B2 patent drawing
  • US11653588B2 patent drawing
  • US11653588B2 patent drawing

AI summary

One or more information maps are obtained by an agricultural work machine. The one or more information maps map one or more agricultural characteristic values at different geographic locations of a field. An in-situ sensor on the agricultural work machine senses an agricultural characteristic as the agricultural work machine moves through the field. A predictive map generator generates a predictive map that predicts a predictive agricultural characteristic at different locations in the field based on a relationship between the values in the one or more information maps and the agricultural characteristic sensed by the in-situ sensor. The predictive map can be output and used in automated machine control.