Preemption Indications for Dynamic Multiplexing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current New Radio (NR) wireless communication systems face challenges in efficiently multiplexing enhanced Mobile Broadband (eMBB) and ultra-reliable and low latency communications (URLLC) services within the same spectrum, due to differing latency requirements, leading to inefficiencies and peak data rate losses.

Innovation Solution

Implementing dynamic multiplexing by configuring access nodes to preempt ongoing eMBB transmissions with URLLC transmissions in time-frequency resources, using preemption indications to assist user equipment in proper signal combining, and employing advanced signaling techniques to manage time-frequency resource allocation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If semi-static partitioning of resources in time domain is used to allocate certain resources for URLLC and eMBB, then resource allocation is simplified, but efficiency and peak data rate are reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresource allocation simplicityVSAvoiddata transmission efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic resource allocation where URLLC transmissions can preempt eMBB resources in real-time based on actual traffic demands and latency requirements. The network device dynamically determines which eMBB resources to puncture for URLLC transmissions, allowing the system to adapt resource allocation to changing conditions rather than using fixed semi-static partitioning.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the allocation parameters dynamically by adjusting the amount and timing of resource preemption based on URLLC traffic arrival patterns and eMBB service quality requirements. The system modifies resource allocation parameters in real-time to optimize both URLLC latency performance and eMBB throughput, rather than maintaining fixed allocation ratios.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If frequency domain multiplexing is used for eMBB and URLLC services, then spectral efficiency is improved, but latency requirements cannot be met due to different service characteristics

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespectral efficiencyVSAvoidURLLC latency
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transitions from purely frequency domain multiplexing to a combined time-frequency domain approach. By introducing time domain preemption capabilities, the system adds a temporal dimension to resource allocation, allowing URLLC to immediately access resources when needed while eMBB continues to utilize allocated frequency resources, thus meeting stringent latency requirements while maintaining spectral efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the resource allocation into different priority levels, where URLLC transmissions are given higher priority and can preempt eMBB resources when necessary. This segmentation allows the system to maintain frequency domain multiplexing for spectral efficiency while enabling time-critical URLLC services to break through frequency allocation constraints when latency requirements demand immediate transmission.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Loss of time

If time domain multiplexing is used for eMBB and URLLC services, then latency requirements are met, but spectral efficiency decreases due to separate resource allocation

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveURLLC latencyVSAvoidspectral efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges frequency domain multiplexing and time domain preemption into a unified resource allocation framework. eMBB and URLLC services share the same frequency resources through frequency domain multiplexing, while time domain preemption mechanisms allow URLLC to dynamically access resources when latency requirements arise. This combination achieves both spectral efficiency through frequency sharing and low latency through time-critical preemption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS11683145B2Preemption indications for new radio
Publication Date: 2023.06.20 APPLE INC
  • US11683145B2 patent drawing
  • US11683145B2 patent drawing
  • US11683145B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Embodiments of dynamic multiplexing are described, including the transmission of preemption indication (PI) to indicate preemption of time-frequency resources. In some embodiments, a next Generation NodeB (gNB) is configured to transmit PIs in signaling to preempt an enhanced Mobile Broadband (eMBB) communications transmission with an ultra-reliable and low latency communications (URLCC) transmission. In some embodiments, a user equipment (UE) is configured to monitor a region of time-frequency resources, within a bandwidth part (BWP), for a PI. The PI indicates to the UE a portion of time-frequency resources that omit transmissions intended for the UE. In some embodiments, the gNB transmits the PI to the UE within preemption indication downlink control information (PI-DCI) in a physical downlink control channel (PDCCH) in a control resource set (CORESET). In some embodiments, the BWP is defined according to a frequency domain location, a bandwidth, and a subcarrier spacing for a given numerology.